Sometimes, if you sit quietly and really pay attention, you can feel something deeper—something gentle, like a hidden music playing beneath everything. It’s not sound you hear with your ears, but a kind of rhythm that flows through life, through thoughts, through the world itself. This silent music connects things in a way we don’t usually notice. It’s always there—under your breath, behind your heartbeat, even in stillness. You don’t need to understand it. Just feel it. That quiet presence is what some call consciousness.
Previous insights pointed toward this. The quantum field danced with uncertainty until observed. Atoms floated in a haze of probabilities until measured. Waves collapsed into particles not through force or contact but through the mysterious act of being “seen.” It was tempting to imagine that human observation caused this collapse, as if consciousness touched the world and forced it to decide. But the mystery goes deeper. Your laptop looks solid and real because its particles have already collapsed from quantum waves into fixed states through endless interactions—with light, air, and even your own eyes. But the real mystery lies in how and why that collapse happens at all. In the quantum world, particles exist in many possible states at once—until something, even a soft touch or the mere chance of being observed, makes them “choose” one. No one fully understands what causes this shift from possibility to reality. It’s as if the universe responds to being watched, or simply to the potential for information to be known. That’s the strange part: reality isn’t made of things alone, but of relationships, touches, and the quiet mystery of why anything becomes definite at all.
Just like quantum particles lose their wave-like nature when touched by the environment, we humans also tend to settle into roles through the subtle influence of those around us. Science calls it decoherence—a process where interaction makes a system appear definite, even if, deep down, its possibilities still exist. In daily life, we act similarly: we appear to “become” something in response to relationships, attention, and expectations. Whether it’s a particle or a person, the presence of others seems to shape the outcome—not always by force, but by quiet connection. Yet, just as quantum physics still puzzles over what truly causes a wave to collapse into a solid fact, we too may never fully know what finally makes us become who we are.
In the quantum world, particles like photons act mysteriously — they don’t need to be physically touched to change. Just placing a detector near one slit in the famous double-slit experiment, even without directly interacting with the particle (means if detector is placed on slit A but particle crossed throgh slit B, even then collapse occures as it is assumed if particle did not crossed throgh A it surely would have crossed through B, as if whole system acts as a combined unit), can collapse its wave-like behavior into a definite path. This collapse isn’t caused by force, but by the mere possibility of observation — a kind of ghostly influence where knowing matters more than touching. Unlike regular interactions that cause temporary decoherence, true observation leads to a lasting collapse, changing the outcome completely. It’s as if reality waits to decide — until someone tries to know.
In the quantum eraser experiment, when one of a pair of entangled photons (let’s call it photon A) hits a detector screen, it may appear to behave like a particle, producing no interference pattern. But here’s the strange part: if the which-path information of its entangled partner (photon B) is later erased — even after photon A has already hit the screen — then interference reappears in the coincidence data of photon A. It is as if photon A’s behavior (wave or particle) depends not on what happened to it directly, but on whether information about its entangled partner was ultimately known or not. The outcome is not about real-time causality but about correlations. No actual signal travels backward in time — yet, the observed pattern appears to change depending on whether we “ask” nature which path photon B took. This is like two deeply connected friends. Suppose one of them is accused of stealing a gold biscuit. Even if innocent, the accusation mentally burdens him — he collapses into a narrow mindset of guilt and self-doubt. But when his close friend is later cleared of all suspicion, or when no inquiry is made into that friend at all, then the first one also feels liberated. The burden lifts, and he regains his full range of being — like a wave of infinite potential once more. In the same way, a human being — especially a child — when trapped in an environment full of assumptions, blame, or fixed expectations, collapses into a single identity. Their growth is stunted. But when they enter a free, open environment where no assumptions are made, they flourish. Like quantum particles in a superposition, they explore multiple possibilities and develop naturally in alignment with life’s evolving intelligence. The quantum eraser shows us that knowing — or merely the potential to know — collapses the wave. In human life too, assumptions — even if unspoken — reduce us to labels. This is why we must be careful with judgments. It is better to stay neutral than to impose a limiting belief on someone, especially a child. Neutrality is not indifference; it is the wisdom to allow natural growth — just as nature reveals her beauty best when left unmeasured. That is why a man shifting to new and open environment where no one knows him (so making assumption about him by anyone is not possible) feels freedom to grow his potential to top. This forces us to think, does quantum world behaves like our minds or if quantum world is conscious. I have observed this entangled state with people many times as I’m already a croocked researcher by default. Haha. At many times people being in full cooperative and comfortable environment felt suffocated for their entangled partners were feeling the same. At other times a man being in gruesome environment felt quite comfortable and growing for his entangled partner was probably feeling the same, although they both had no contact with each others.
Just like the quantum world, the gross (physical) world also runs on assumptions. People used to perform yajnas assuming that Indra, the god of rain, would bless them with rainfall — and it used to happen. People invest money in companies assuming they will generate profits, and this collective assumption drives the stock market. When an officer is given a job, it is assumed that he will fulfill his duties publicly, and he does the same.
Decoherence explains how quantum possibilities fade due to environmental noise, while collapse marks the mysterious final selection of one definite outcome when observed. Similarly, worldly interactions reduce a human’s wavering or confused nature—this is like decoherence, gently pushing one toward alignment. But when a guru or guiding force observes and nurtures that potential with clear intent, the person transforms into a definite form—an artist, a yogi, or something greater. This is collapse.
Decoherence explains how quantum possibilities fade amid environmental noise, much like how worldly influences narrow a person’s scattered potential into a specific direction — a student becoming serious, a wanderer finding purpose. But the true mystery lies in the collapse: how, out of countless outcomes, a single destiny is chosen — just as a quantum particle suddenly ‘decides’ on one path when observed, so too does a person, under the subtle influence of a guru or a defining moment, become an artist, a yogi, or something else entirely.
A quantum particle, in its wave-like state, mirrors the wandering nature of the uncontrolled human mind—full of possibilities, undefined and fluid. Decoherence, like a focused environment shaping a person’s thoughts, suppresses this wandering and narrows the mind’s fluctuations, leading it toward clarity. Just as decoherence reduces the quantum superposition into a more definite range of outcomes, a stabilized mind is no longer distracted by countless directions. But the real mystery lies in the final collapse—how a quantum particle, from a sea of probabilities, “chooses” a specific outcome, just as a focused mind settles on one life path out of hundreds. The particle might collapse into a position, momentum, spin, or energy state, depending on the kind of measurement—each equally probable until the moment of interaction. Likewise, a human mind, when undecided, holds many possible outcomes: a career path, a moral choice, an emotional response, or a creative direction. The final decision may be influenced by the laws of physics in the quantum realm and by a blend of personal values, subconscious conditioning, societal needs, and harmony with the world in the human case. This convergence of potential into a single reality remains one of the deepest mysteries shared by both consciousness and quantum nature. I personally believe, the same guiding force of infinity guides both mind and the quantum world to produce a streamlined and progressive world. Moreover, In quantum experiments, repeating the same setup doesn’t give the same outcome every time. A particle may land at different positions with each trial, even though the conditions are identical. This is because quantum mechanics is probabilistic, not predictable in the classical sense. Over many repetitions, a clear pattern forms, but each individual result remains uncertain—just like the human mind may respond differently to the same situation depending on subtle internal shifts, but pattern of these shifts can be predictable just like pattern of position of quantum particle. Though both the quantum world and the human mind appear probabilistic—producing different outcomes under the same conditions—there still seems to be a deeper, unseen intelligence or system that guides the final choice. In quantum physics, this mystery surrounds what actually causes a wavefunction (probability wave of finding the particle) to collapse into one specific result. In the mind, it’s the subtle blend of intuition, conditioning, and perhaps a deeper purpose that decides. Beneath the randomness, both seem to obey a hidden order. We speculate a deciding intelligence not because science proves it, but because randomness without reason feels incomplete. When repeated outcomes form meaningful patterns — in nature, life, or personal growth — it hints at a quiet intelligence choosing not randomly, but purposefully, whether hidden in physics or within consciousness.
It is true that collapse happens even when no conscious being is watching. If a detector is placed in the path of a particle, the wavefunction still collapses. The measuring instrument leaves a mark, and that mark remains even if no eye ever sees it. So does this mean consciousness plays no role? That the universe ticks forward on its own, without awareness?
Not quite. The key lies in understanding what “measurement” really is. In the quantum world, not every interaction counts as measurement. Particles interact all the time—with air, with heat, with stray radiation—and yet those interactions do not cause collapse. Instead, they lead to what is called decoherence. The quantum system becomes entangled with its environment. It loses its delicate superposition. The interference between different possibilities disappears. The system starts to behave as if it has become classical. But there’s a difference—collapse has still not happened. All possibilities still exist, hidden from view, tangled up with the countless details of the environment.
Measurement, in contrast, is not just interaction. It is interaction followed by amplification, stabilization, and irreversibility. A detector doesn’t merely touch the particle—it traps the event. It records it in a way that cannot be undone. A photon hits a screen, triggers electrons, produces a visible dot, or changes a number in a memory cell. From then on, the system is no longer in a state of possibility. It is in a state of fact. But that fact, though physically stored, still hovers in uncertainty until accessed—until it becomes part of some larger knowing, perhaps even conscious knowing.
This opens a strange in-between realm. Is the collapse real and physical, happening at the moment the detector records the event? Or does the final collapse, the true one, occur only when that information becomes part of someone’s conscious experience? Interpretations vary. Some say yes, some say no. But the deeper view, and perhaps the one more aligned with ancient darshan and subtle observation, is that even the detector, the machine, the experiment—all appear within a wider field of awareness.
Whether collapse happens “on its own” or “because of consciousness” is a question that may never find a final answer in equations. But the point remains—Decoherence is like a partial collapse of the quantum wave. It happens when a quantum system interacts with the environment, causing the wave-like behavior to break down. But full collapse — where a specific outcome is chosen — happens when a conscious observer tries to know it directly. This observer doesn’t always have to be a human. In some views, the background omnipresent consciousness — the pure awareness that exists everywhere — also acts as an observer. This means quantum collapse could happen even without human involvement, just by being known in the field of universal consciousness.
In other words, Knowing, or gyana, is an inherent quality of consciousness as per Hindu philosophy. Therefore, the interaction of the environment with a particle can be seen as a feature of knowing, which is inherent to consciousness itself. If that is the case, then such interaction should also lead to collapse. Decoherence can be considered a kind of partial collapse, while full collapse occurs when a conscious human being directly tries to know or observe the system. There can be some environmental interactions, that fully mimic the human observation.
The gross physical world is objectively real — solid, measurable, and consistent, forming a shared stage for all beings. But how each of us experiences it is deeply subjective, shaped by our beliefs, emotions, and level of consciousness. Reality unfolds on two levels: the external world we all see, and the inner world we each uniquely interpret. Both are real — the first supports survival and interaction, the second gives meaning and direction. True understanding lies in recognizing that while the world exists, the way we experience it is our own creation — the final collapse happens through us.
In this light, even the detectors, instruments, and screens are expressions of that same awareness. They act as intermediaries, catching and recording interactions, but their existence, their intelligibility, rests on a foundation that is not mechanical. A camera may record an image, but unless some deeper knowing holds the possibility of meaning, the image is just a flicker of matter. Without awareness, form is blind. Without awareness, even information is meaningless.
And so, the mystery is not solved by saying “measurement causes collapse.” It only deepens. For what defines measurement? Why does one interaction cause collapse and not another? Why does the universe act as if it’s waiting to be known? Is this the same saying by ancient seers that prakriti wants herself to show to purusha? Why do probabilities persist until something final happens, and what is this finality?
The ancient seers may not have used the term “wavefunction collapse,” but they pointed toward the same mystery. They spoke of chidakasha—the space of consciousness—within which all forms arise and disappear. Forms appear in the mind like particles collapsed, at varied spatial locations, with varied intensity or energy, and with contrasting qualities like up or down spin, and so on. Those forms may be rapidly fluctuating like superimposed, a little stable like decohered, or fully stationary as in dhyana, like collapsed to a permanent, fixed meditation image. Sometimes when not deeply observed or only witnessed, those forms disappear into the invisible waves of chidakasha. Seers spoke of the drashta, the witness, who is untouched by action yet whose presence allows action to be known. They observed that the world changes shape in the presence of inner silence. That clarity comes not from thinking harder, but from quieting down. And that when the “I” dissolves, reality becomes strangely luminous—clearer, yet unspeakable.
In quantum physics, it’s important to distinguish between a particle that already exists and a particle that hasn’t yet been created. A single particle, like an electron, travels as a probability wave but always appears as that same one particle when detected — never more or less. In quantum field theory, particles can also be created or destroyed when the right energy and interactions are present. In that case, the “wave” describes a field of possibility from which one, many, or no particles may emerge, much like rain forming from unseen vapor when conditions align.
In Sharirvigyan darshan, the body is not a container but a shape formed inside awareness. Atoms are not solid pieces, but small waves in a deeper field. The body is like a tool, tuned to a certain level of consciousness. It doesn’t stand apart—it comes from the same field. Every feeling, thought, cell, and breath of energy is part of one whole movement. And behind it all is not a person, but a quiet presence—just watching, not doing, yet allowing everything to happen.
In other words, an atom is like a complete human body in itself. The brain is everything in a body, and that brain seems exactly similar inside the atom. Its different electrons orbiting in different orbitals are like its different personalities. Each electron, having countless probable outcomes, is like its countless thoughts. The collapses of these countless probable outcomes into real outcomes are like its countless decisions — and much more. On contemplating — or even barely believing — this similarity, one may not become an accomplished void like the atom, but at least one would loosen the binding grip of ego and personal gratification. This is the essence of Sharirvigyan Darshan on a universal scale.
Consciousness doesn’t come from the brain. The brain comes from consciousness. It’s not outside, watching — it is the space in which everything happens. In physics, the wave becomes a particle not because someone looked at it with eyes, but because reality is already aware at its core. This awareness is not added later — it is the first thing, the source of everything.
As ancient seers said, God wished, “I am one, let me become many.” That wish itself is consciousness observing. And that observation is what creates the world by collapsing probability waves into ineracting particles.
When the mind quiets, this becomes not a theory but an experience. One feels directly that knowing does not require thought. That awareness does not flicker. That even in sleep, even in stillness, even in the space between breaths, there is something present—calm, clear, unbroken. And that this presence is not inside the body. Rather, the body is inside it.
At first glance, this may seem opposite to science. But science too is arriving at the edge of its own language. When electrons behave like waves and collapse like particles, when matter appears as energy and energy as probability, when the very act of knowing affects the known—then science too must bow to the mystery. Not to abandon reason, but to expand it. To see that reason itself arises from a deeper intuition—the intuition of being.
And this is where the paths of darshan and physics converge. Both look at the world and ask—not just what is happening, but how is it happening, and who is it happening for? Both come to the same edge, where logic dissolves into directness. Both stand in awe of a universe that is not built from objects, but from relationships. Not constructed from bricks, but from waves. Not powered by things, but by presence.
So when the measuring instrument causes collapse, it is not contradicting the role of consciousness. It is revealing it more subtly. Even the machine collapses the wave because it is part of the same dream. It is part of the same story told within awareness. And that awareness is not limited to humans, not limited to minds, not limited to any form. It is the infinite container that holds all forms, the screen on which all images move.
In the end, every collapse, every emergence, every ripple of creation points back to the same silent origin. That origin is not seen. It is the seer. Not thought. Not body. Not name. But the unbroken presence in which thought, body, and name appear and disappear like waves in the ocean. That is how consciousness connects the dots—without doing anything, yet allowing everything.
And to live from that knowing, even for a moment, is to realize that the world is not a collection of events. It is a living unity, unfolding inside its own mirror. And that mirror is consciousness—mysterious, infinite, and profoundly real.
Moreover, Scientists say it is just the probability of quantum particles collapsing to a specific outcome — nothing like an intelligent decision. But I ask: why is there a fixed pattern of higher probability in certain situations, always? Isn’t that a sign of intelligence? If it were truly arbitrary probability without any consistent pattern, we would call it non-intelligent. But quantum systems tend to express themselves more clearly in specific, fixed conditions. Collapsed quantum particles concentrate more in regions where there would be constructive interference, rather than in regions of destructive interference, assuming their wave nature. Constructive interference regions appear as bright bands, and destructive interference as dark bands. This means electrons tend to move toward the bright regions. We humans, as living beings, do the same — we are drawn to bright regions: bright futures, bright careers, bright education, and brighter living. Constructive interference regions are high amplitude areas. Human also tend to move towards regions of high position like higher post, higher social status, higher pay scale etc. Then what is the difference between us and quantum particles or atom, in terms of instinct? It’s not that the dark bands are empty — particles land there too, just less frequently. Similarly, it’s not that bad environments are devoid of humans, but the human strength there is low. This tendency of every particle toward brighter and higher situations seems to drive the world’s forward progression.
Demystifying Kundalini 