Tag: Meditation

Hanuman Ansh: The Hidden Spiritual Symbolism Behind Neem Karoli Baba’s Miracles

Watching Hanuman Ansh Through a Spiritual Lens

Friends, I went today to the theatre to see the blockbuster movie Hanuman Ansh. The emotions in the movie are powerful, but what interested me even more was how many of the apparently miraculous events can also be understood as symbolic expressions of inner spiritual experiences. I do not feel that every event has to be forced into either a literal miracle or a fictional story. Some may have been experienced as extraordinary events, while at the same time carrying a deeper psychological and yogic meaning.

One scene that particularly affected me was the freedom fighter eating chana-puri. On the surface it is only a simple meal, but emotionally it becomes almost an ultimate expression of hunger and satiety. Hunger is one of the most basic limitations of the body, and the satisfaction that comes from food can communicate relief, dignity and joy without requiring elaborate words. The simplicity of the scene is precisely what gives it such emotional strength.

Baba Standing in Cold Water and the Symbolism of Kundalini

Another scene showed Baba standing in water and remaining in samadhi for an extended period. My own feeling while watching it was that the cold water could symbolically represent a powerful stimulus to the body, with the resulting inward movement being portrayed through yogic language as energy rising from Muladhara through Sushumna. In the traditional Kundalini understanding, the awakening and upward movement of Shakti is associated with the transformation of consciousness and deeper states of meditation.

Of course, this should be understood as a yogic interpretation rather than as an established physiological explanation. Cold water produces strong bodily and autonomic responses, whereas science has not demonstrated that such responses are literally Kundalini moving through Sushumna. Still, as a symbolic reading of the scene, the connection is meaningful: the body is exposed to an intense experience while awareness appears to become increasingly inward and absorbed.

The Prison Lock as Liberation From Limited Identification

The events that appear miraculous in Baba’s life can similarly be understood as symbolic. When the prison lock opens by itself and Baba wanders outside, I see something more than simply a miraculous opening of a physical lock. The prison can represent the limited identification of consciousness with the body, personality and circumstances. The opening of the lock can therefore symbolize the breaking of that limitation.

Baba walking out of the prison becomes an image of consciousness moving beyond confinement into something much vaster. If this is connected with samadhi, the symbolism becomes even deeper: the body may remain in the world, but awareness is no longer experienced as confined to the ordinary boundaries of individual identity. The movement is from prison, to locked identity, to the opening of the lock, to freedom and finally to the vastness of existence.

The Serpents Around Baba and Awakened Kundalini Shakti

I also remembered the account in which a devotee saw Neem Karoli Baba covered with hooded snakes while he was in samadhi. To me, this too can be understood as a powerful representation of awakened Kundalini Shakti. The serpent is one of the oldest symbols associated with Kundalini in Indian yoga. Therefore, seeing serpents surrounding a yogi absorbed in samadhi can naturally be interpreted as the devotee perceiving the immense Shakti associated with his spiritual state.

We cannot know from such an account whether actual snakes were physically present, whether the devotee experienced a visionary perception, or whether the experience was influenced by familiar spiritual symbolism. But the symbolic meaning remains striking: serpent, Kundalini Shakti, awakening, ascent of consciousness and samadhi all come together in a single image.

The Train That Would Not Move and the Power of Guilt

Another event has an equally interesting psychological interpretation. Baba was pushed out of a train, but afterward the train would not start. This can be seen symbolically as the train of life itself stopping after an innocent person has been wronged. The person may have thought that he had simply removed an unwanted passenger, but suddenly the entire movement of the train comes to a halt.

It resembles the way guilt can stop the inner movement of a person. An innocent person is hurt, conscience becomes disturbed, guilt arises, and the normal momentum of life is interrupted until there is recognition and remorse. In this sense, what we reject or hurt outwardly can become an obstruction within ourselves. The story is therefore not merely about punishment; it can also represent the power of innocence, compassion and spiritual presence to interrupt the unconscious momentum of the ego.

Miracles, Telepathy and the Traditional Yogic View of Siddhis

There may also be other events in Baba’s life that appear telepathic or clairvoyant. I do not think we should automatically dismiss such accounts. In the traditional yogic framework, extraordinary perceptions and abilities, called siddhis, are described as possibilities arising from profound concentration and samadhi. Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras, particularly the Vibhuti Pada, discusses such capacities.

At the same time, not being disproved is not the same as being scientifically established. Modern science has not established telepathy, teleportation or clairvoyance as reliable supernatural abilities, and individual stories can have different explanations. So I would leave the question open rather than making an absolute claim. A spiritual account may be interpreted literally by a devotee, symbolically by a contemplative, psychologically by a modern reader, or perhaps, in some cases, as an extraordinary phenomenon that we do not yet understand.

The important point in yoga is also that siddhis are not themselves liberation. Even when such abilities arise, attachment to them can become another distraction from samadhi and realization. The purpose of spiritual practice remains freedom, not the acquisition of extraordinary powers.

The Child Who Wanted to Reach God

Perhaps the most touching part for me is the story of how Baba’s spiritual search was inspired in childhood. When people told him that his deceased mother had gone to God, he apparently took the statement with the directness of a child. If his mother had gone to God, then he too wanted to go there. This desire became strong enough that he eventually left home in search of yoga and the means of reaching that state.

There is something profound in this simplicity. He did not begin with complicated theories about chakras, Kundalini or enlightenment. He began with longing: if there is a place called God, I want to reach it. From that simple question came the search for yoga, renunciation, spiritual practice and eventually samadhi. It reminds me that the deepest spiritual journey may begin not with philosophy but with an intense longing to know what lies beyond ordinary existence. I still remember my childhood, when my family tried to console me after my elder sister was gone, telling me that she had gone to God. As a child, I accepted those words with a simple heart, imagining that she had only gone somewhere beyond my reach.

The Essence of Tantra in a Few Words

Another thing that struck me was the simplicity of the instruction given to the child Baba by his guru: to leave dhyana at the Ajna chakra and place it at the Muladhara chakra. The deeper implication is that this can establish strong dhyana at the Ajna chakra by itself, without continuously forcing attention there. To me, this is perhaps one of the most basic and complete essences of Tantra expressed in an extraordinarily few words. The teaching does not need a long philosophical explanation; a simple direction contains an entire method, which the practitioner can discover through practice. Teaching Tantra in such simple and little words is itself amazing.

The Psychology of the Bahelia Scene

One scene is particularly profound from a psychological and spiritual point of view. A Bahelia, meaning a bird-catcher or fowler, is shown catching birds and imprisoning them. When Baba asks him why he does this, the Bahelia gives a surprisingly philosophical answer. He says, in effect, that just as nature has imprisoned human beings and entangled them in troubles, he is simply doing the same to the birds. It also helps him earn bread and butter for his children.

This is remarkable because the Bahelia does not even believe in God. Yet, at some deeper level, he feels that something is trapping human beings and making them suffer. Since he sees himself as a victim of this mysterious force, he feels justified in reproducing the same pattern with the birds—imprisoning them because he himself feels imprisoned.

Baba then completely changes his perspective. Instead of allowing him to blame God or nature for his suffering, Baba points him toward his own actions. Baba asks him why he had beaten his wife when she was pregnant. The implication is profound: it is not God or nature that is arbitrarily entangling a person; one’s own actions can become the very cause of one’s bondage and suffering.

The Bahelia had been looking outward for the cause of his troubles. Baba makes him look inward. What he experienced as an external force imprisoning him could actually be the consequence of his own actions. Thus, the scene transforms the idea of “I am being imprisoned by nature” into “I may be bound by what I myself have done.”

The psychological transformation that follows is equally beautiful. When Baba reveals details of the Bahelia’s past that he could not ordinarily have known, his disbelief begins to break down. He develops faith in Baba and eventually becomes one of his principal devotees.

The scene therefore works on a very subtle psychological level. Baba does not simply tell the Bahelia to believe in God. He first breaks his habit of projecting the cause of his suffering onto the outside world and brings his attention back to his own life and actions. That inward turning becomes the beginning of his transformation.

The symbolism is especially powerful: the bird-catcher himself feels caught. He imprisons birds because he feels imprisoned by life. Baba shows him that the real trap may not be nature at all—it may be the bondage created by one’s own actions.Seeing the

The Symbolism of the Germinating Seeds

Another beautiful incident occurs when Baba’s wife becomes annoyed by his long periods away from home, absorbed in deep dhyana and samadhi, and by his apparent lack of attention to family life. She asks him what he actually gains from spending so much time in meditation and samadhi.

Baba does not answer her verbally. Instead, he extends his tongue, places a few grains of seeds on it, and, within moments, they germinate and grow into tiny seedlings or plants. His answer is symbolic rather than literal: this is what he gains through such intense spiritual practice—extraordinarily rapid spiritual development.

The symbolism is simple yet profound. Under ordinary conditions, a seed takes time to germinate, grow, and eventually become a plant. In the same way, an ordinary human life may involve a gradual process of inner development through experience, relationships, worldly responsibilities, and spiritual practice. But Baba’s life of exceptionally intense meditation and samadhi is portrayed as accelerating that process dramatically—as though a seed that normally takes a long time to become a plant could mature in moments.

Thus, without explaining anything in words, Baba gives his wife a visual answer: the time spent in deep meditation is not simply time taken away from life; for him, it is a means of accelerating the growth of consciousness.

Miracles as a Language of Inner Experience

After watching Hanuman Ansh, I therefore feel that the miraculous stories surrounding Baba can be approached on several levels at once. The chana-puri scene expresses the bodily movement from hunger to satiety; the cold water and samadhi can suggest the inward movement of energy; the opening prison can symbolize liberation from limited identification; the serpents can represent awakened Kundalini Shakti; the stopped train can represent conscience and guilt interrupting the momentum of life; and the accounts of telepathic or clairvoyant perception can be considered in the context of the traditional yogic descriptions of siddhis, while leaving their literal interpretation open.

For me, this makes the story more meaningful rather than less miraculous. What appears outwardly as a miracle may also be a language through which an inner spiritual event is being communicated. The physical story, the devotional interpretation, the symbolic meaning, the psychology of consciousness and the possibility of extraordinary yogic experience do not necessarily have to cancel one another. They can exist together, allowing us to watch the life of a yogi not merely as a collection of miraculous incidents, but as a possible symbolic map of the movement from bodily limitation toward freedom, expanded awareness and the divine.

Black Hole and the Human Self: Imprints, Detachment, Yoga and Liberation

The idea began with a simple question about black holes: is there any evidence that a black hole disappears more quickly than expected? The answer is that there is still no direct observational proof that an ordinary astrophysical black hole is actually evaporating and dying through Hawking radiation. Hawking evaporation is a theoretical prediction, not yet a practically demonstrated fact for real astronomical black holes. Small black holes are theoretically expected to evaporate much faster as they become smaller and hotter, while large black holes should lose mass so slowly that their lifetimes are enormously longer than the present age of the universe. This distinction between theoretical prediction and practical proof became important for my own intuition. I feel that a black hole should also ultimately die rather than remain forever. Yet I do not mean only the physical black hole. I began to see the black hole as a possible metaphor for something much closer to human existence: the self.

The Human Self as a Structure of Imprints

My intuition is that the human self is not necessarily an independent physical substance. It can be understood as a structure formed from worldly experience, memory, identification, conditioning and repeated psychological impressions. In this sense, the self is built from what it has experienced and retained. It imitates the experienced world through accumulated imprints. The more deeply these experiences are identified with and stored, the more stable and substantial the self appears to become. When the self is strongly imprinted by the gross physical world, the black hole becomes an interesting symbolic comparison: both can be imagined as structures that accumulate and concentrate what enters them. I do not mean that a physical black hole is literally a human self or that modern physics has established a connection between black holes and consciousness. The comparison is philosophical rather than scientific. What interests me is the similarity between accumulation and dissolution.

Imprint Formation and Imprint Dissolution

The self can then be viewed through two opposing processes: the formation of new imprints and the dissolution of previous ones. If imprint formation is greater than imprint dissolution, the accumulated structure of self remains stable or becomes stronger. If both processes are roughly equal, the self remains comparatively stable without major transformation. But when imprint dissolution exceeds imprint formation, the accumulated structure gradually becomes lighter and weaker. This gives a simple way of understanding the movement toward liberation. Liberation, in this framework, is not merely having fewer experiences. It is the reduction of the total accumulation of psychological impressions.

This distinction is important because preventing new impressions and dissolving old impressions are not the same thing. A person may isolate themselves from the world and thereby reduce new imprint formation. Fewer worldly contacts mean fewer opportunities for fresh conditioning. But if previously accumulated impressions are not being dissolved, those old impressions simply remain. Isolation may produce quietness, but quietness by itself is not necessarily liberation. When the person returns to ordinary life, old conditioning may still reactivate. The storehouse has not disappeared merely because nothing new has been added to it.

Detachment as Prevention of New Imprints

There is another way to prevent new imprint formation: remaining in the world while becoming detached from identification. Instead of withdrawing from experience, one continues to live, work, relate and encounter pleasure and pain, but does not allow every experience to become another layer of psychological identity. Pleasure need not become an insistence that it must be repeated. Insult need not become a permanent story of “I was insulted.” Success need not become a definition of “who I am.” Experience can arise and pass without being appropriated. In this sense, isolation reduces the input, whereas detachment reduces the imprinting mechanism itself. The world continues to provide experience, but experience increasingly fails to become new conditioning.

This seems more radical because the world itself becomes the field of practice. One does not need to escape life in order to prevent new imprints; one learns to experience without accumulating identity. Eventually, even deliberate detachment may become unnecessary if witnessing becomes sufficiently established. Experience can simply arise, be known and pass without leaving a strong psychological residue.

Yoga, Samadhi and the Dissolution of Old Imprints

Yet even perfect detachment would not by itself complete the process. If no new impressions are formed while old ones remain untouched, the old structure persists. Therefore something more is required: the dissolution of previously accumulated imprints. This is where practices such as yoga, deep meditation, witnessing and samadhi become important within this model. Existing conditioning is brought into awareness without identification, and through repeated non-attachment its psychological force can gradually diminish. Thus there are really two complementary movements: detachment prevents the creation of new conditioning, while deep yogic practice dissolves conditioning that has already accumulated.

The relationship can be expressed very simply. If imprint formation is greater than dissolution, the self becomes more conditioned. If formation and dissolution balance each other, the self remains relatively stable. If dissolution becomes greater than formation, the total conditioning steadily decreases. The ideal direction is therefore not merely to stop adding new impressions but to allow the old ones to disappear as well. Liberation requires both processes working together: less new imprinting and greater dissolution of existing imprints.

The Self as a Black-Hole Analogy

This is where the black-hole analogy becomes meaningful for me. A black hole can gain mass when matter and energy enter it. It can theoretically lose mass through Hawking radiation. If the inflow is greater than the outflow, the black hole grows. If the outflow eventually becomes greater than the inflow, its mass decreases and it moves toward evaporation. The same pattern can be used metaphorically for the self. New experience identified with becomes new psychological imprint, just as incoming matter adds to a black hole. Witnessing, detachment and deep yogic dissolution act like the opposite movement. If new imprint formation is greater than dissolution, the self grows in psychological density. If dissolution exceeds new imprint formation, the accumulated self becomes progressively lighter.

This also clarifies why simply avoiding the world is insufficient. If matter stops entering a black hole but nothing causes its existing mass to leave, the black hole does not disappear merely because inflow has stopped. Likewise, if new impressions are prevented but old impressions are never dissolved, the self remains. Existing conditioning has to be released. Therefore preventing imprint formation and dissolving previous imprints are not competing methods but complementary necessities within this model.

From Conditioned Self to Unimprinted Awareness

The final possibility is what I would call the unimprinted self. As new imprint formation approaches zero and the existing accumulation continues to dissolve, the self becomes progressively less conditioned. The world may still be experienced, but experiences no longer become deeply embedded as identity. The process can therefore be understood as a gradual movement from a heavily conditioned self toward an increasingly pure and unimprinted state.

There is, however, a deeper question at the end of this process. If all accumulated identification finally dissolves, is what remains really a purified self, or is it awareness without the separate structure that previously called itself “me”? Perhaps the stages are better understood as conditioned self, purified self, and finally the disappearance of the separate self-structure. In that sense, the death of the self is not necessarily the destruction of consciousness. It may mean the dissolution of the structure that had identified consciousness with a personal accumulation of experience.

This gives a simple definition of liberation: not freedom from the world itself, but freedom from the world continually becoming psychological imprint and from those imprints continually becoming self. Experience can continue, but it no longer has to become identity. New accumulation declines while old accumulation dissolves. The self becomes less dense, less reactive and less dependent on what it has stored. Like the black hole in the metaphor, what matters is not merely that something stops entering, but that what has already accumulated is progressively released. In this sense, liberation is the point at which dissolution consistently exceeds accumulation, until the constructed, imprinted self approaches its own disappearance.

Smaller Imprints, Faster Liberation: Why Meditation in Childhood May Matter

There is an interesting parallel between black-hole evaporation and the gradual dissolution of psychological imprints through meditation. A smaller black hole is theoretically expected to evaporate faster as its mass decreases, because its temperature rises and its rate of mass loss increases. In a similar way, it may be possible to think of a meditator as progressing faster toward liberation once the accumulated structure of worldly imprint has already become smaller. This is a philosophical analogy, not an established scientific equivalence, but the parallel is striking.
It may also help explain why meditation is traditionally encouraged from childhood. A child has had less time to accumulate deep worldly conditioning and identification. If meditation, spiritual companionship and a supportive environment begin early, the formation of new impressions may be reduced while existing impressions are comparatively few. In that sense, the inner “mass” that has to be dissolved is smaller from the beginning.
My own experience gives me a personal example of this possibility. Meditation began in my childhood through close association with a spiritual guru and through the environment at home. This early foundation continued to influence me and was followed by an awakening experience during adolescence. Yet complete dissolution did not occur at that stage. The needs and attractions of worldly life continued to create new impressions and prevented the process from reaching its full conclusion.
Traditional accounts sometimes describe exceptionally early liberation. Shukadeva, for example, is portrayed in Indian spiritual tradition as being liberated while still very young. Whether such accounts are taken historically, spiritually or symbolically, they fit naturally into the idea that a person who begins with fewer accumulated worldly impressions may reach deep realization more quickly.
There may also be another important similarity. In black-hole physics, the evaporation rate becomes greater as the black hole becomes smaller. In meditation, once a practitioner has become sufficiently familiar with meditation and a significant portion of accumulated conditioning has already dissolved, progress may also become easier and faster. Earlier experiences of inner clarity can strengthen confidence, reduce fear of the unknown and make deeper meditation more natural. The meditator no longer approaches the process as something completely unfamiliar; familiarity itself becomes a support for further dissolution.
Thus the process may have an accelerating character: less accumulated imprint → easier meditation → greater dissolution → greater confidence → deeper meditation → still less imprint. In this sense, childhood meditation may provide an especially favorable beginning because the psychological structure that has to be dissolved is still comparatively small. The analogy with an evaporating black hole therefore suggests an interesting possibility: as the accumulated imprint becomes smaller, the movement toward complete freedom may itself become progressively faster.

Deep Dhyana, Self-Realization and Nondual Awakening: How Witnessing Dissolves Inner Imprints

Deep Dhyana as a Window into the Actual Self

It seems to me that during deep dhyana we are able to live, even if only temporarily, in the experience of our full structure of self, together with its actual state of development. This is not merely an idea about ourselves or a mental image of who we think we are. It is experienced in a subtler and more essential form. At other times, worldly distractions occupy our attention so completely that this deeper structure is forgotten. We continue to live, act and think, but we remain largely outside our actual form. In this sense, I have described the dhyana state as a kind of window into our real being, and ordinary life outside that window can feel almost like a state of existential death. This does not mean physical death or that the self ceases to exist. It means that the deeper dimension of oneself, which becomes directly accessible in deep dhyana, becomes functionally absent from ordinary awareness.

Why the Ancient Teaching About the World and the Soul Becomes Clear in Experience

This makes me think that what the ancient sages said about the world being different from the soul, and about worldly life making us blind to the soul, may be pointing to an experience rather than merely presenting a strange metaphysical theory. In theory, such statements can easily be misunderstood. They may sound as though the physical world is unreal or that the soul is some mysterious supernatural object hidden somewhere inside us. In practical experience, however, the distinction can become much clearer. The world does not necessarily destroy or remove the soul. Rather, our attention becomes absorbed in sensory experiences, thoughts, desires, reactions, identities, memories and external objects, and therefore we forget the deeper structure of our own being. Dhyana reverses the direction of attention. When the outward movement becomes sufficiently quiet, what was previously obscured can become directly apparent. Thus the contrast is not simply between a false world and a true soul, but between world-directed consciousness in which the self is forgotten and inwardly gathered consciousness in which the self becomes perceptible.

The Soul as the Complete Intrinsic State of Being

I do not see the soul as something special or as an additional supernatural substance added to a person. By soul I mean one’s own complete state of being as it exists in itself, without something foreign being newly added to it from outside. Yet this does not mean that the self is completely devoid of external influences. The self bears the imprints of everything it has experienced. These experiences, however, are not necessarily present within the self in the same gross and differentiated form in which they were originally encountered. Experientially, they may exist in a subtle, consolidated and relatively undifferentiated form. Therefore, the self is not an untouched thing standing apart from all experience. It is a being in which experience has been assimilated into a deeper structure. We can say self gets colored according to what it has experienced till date. In deep breathless dhyana, it is same eternal self but it is not pure rather it is individualised by experiential imprints.

From Gross Experience to Subtle Imprint

This gives a different meaning to the distinction between self and non-self. A gross experience that has not yet become assimilated into the subtle structure of the self can appear foreign or non-self. It is something occurring to us from outside in its gross, differentiated form. When experience becomes imprinted and assimilated, however, it becomes part of our own subtle experiential structure. It is not like something physical adheres to self as nothing can stick to void, the true nature of self. Yes, its experience gets somewhat distorted and this distorsion is according to the extent and nature of the external experiences. It is like a illusion. Just as, after revolving round and round for some time, the world around may seem to revolve for a while when we stop, though the world itself has remained stationary as before, similarly, after prolonged experience of the external world, our own self may appear different and foreign, though in reality it remains the same pure own form as before. The movement can therefore be understood as gross experience becoming an imprint, the imprint becoming subtly consolidated, and the consolidated impression becoming part of the self. In this sense, what is non-self is not necessarily everything that originates outside the body or mind. Rather, it is what has not yet been assimilated into one’s own deeper structure of being or pure self form. Everything we experience is, in some sense, our own self, because we can never experience anything other than what becomes present within the self. No physical thing can literally be attached to the self as something separate and then experienced as part of it. For the self to experience something fully, it has to take the form of that experience itself. Yet this self has become partitioned through experience. When an experience exists only as a mental pattern or as a gross external impression, it is experienced as non-self or as something foreign. But when that experience becomes deeply imprinted and assimilated as a change in the feeling and structure of the self, it is no longer experienced as something separate; it has become the self itself.

This may also explain why, after moderate drinking, a person can sometimes experience a temporary sense of joy or relief, as though the outer distractions have been reduced and one comes closer to a feeling of oneself. But what becomes accessible is not necessarily the pure self; it is still the self carrying all its accumulated imprints. Alcohol may temporarily weaken the ordinary mental activity through which worldly distinctions and distractions are maintained, making the underlying feeling of self seem clearer. Yet it does not remove the imprints. In fact, after heavy worldly involvement, experiences that might otherwise have gradually dissolved through witnessing can become more deeply impressed or carried forward as further conditioning. Thus the temporary relief may give the impression that the road has become clearer, while the underlying burden has not actually been removed. It may simply have been carried forward to be released later. Witnessing, in contrast, allows impressions to arise and dissolve without adding the same kind of further burden, so that the self can gradually become lighter, clearer and less partitioned. Actually, the mental noise that arises after worldliness is there to dissolve the imprint of that worldliness through witnessing. The imprint of worldliness has already been registered on the Self. This mental noise arises as a process through which that imprint can be dissolved, particularly when it is witnessed without interference. It is as though the fresh imprint is still loosely fixed and can therefore be released through awareness and witnessing.

If this mental noise is forcefully suppressed by will, continuously drowned out by further indulgence in the world as a means of forgetting it, or suppressed through the consumption of some substance, the opportunity for its dissolution is prevented. Instead of allowing the freshly formed, loosely fixed imprint to be erased through witnessing, such actions may reinforce or preserve it. With time, the imprint can become more deeply fixed and therefore much more difficult to remove. Daily yoga helps to shed fresh imprints from self as soon as they are formed easily. By this self gradually become lighter, clearer and less partitioned because, as the burden of accumulated imprints is shed, the darkness created by those imprints gradually diminishes. The self becomes clearer and begins to correspond more closely with the shimmering, undivided character of the external world as it is directly experienced. What had seemed divided between self and world becomes less sharply separated, not because the self becomes something new, but because the accumulated obscurations that made it appear separate are gradually released. Once this process reaches its full extent, the separation between self and the experienced world becomes completely nil. There is no longer a sense of the self standing apart from what is experienced. In that moment, there may be a glimpse of nondual awakening—a direct self-realisation in which the self is experienced without the partition that ordinarily separates it from the world. This is not the creation of a new self, but the recognition of the same self after the accumulated imprints and obscurations that made it appear separate have fallen away. However, the glimpse of awakening may fade after a few moments. The self then seems to regain its previous imprinted structure, although often in a somewhat lighter form. In my understanding, the sudden glimpse occurs through a strong upward movement of kundalini, which temporarily breaks through the accumulated structure and reveals the nondual state. But a glimpse is not the same as complete purification. If the self has been accumulating impressions through countless experiences over an enormously long period, their complete dissolution may require decades of meditation and witnessing. Awakening therefore need not be regarded as the end of the journey. It can instead be understood as a road marker: a brief direct glimpse of the destination that confirms what lies beyond the accumulated structure, while the remaining work is the gradual clearing of the imprints that still obscure it.

Witnessing Dhyana and the Release of Worldly Imprints

This also explains what seems to happen during witnessing dhyana. The self contains accumulated impressions, and these impressions can arise into consciousness as thoughts, memories, images, emotions, sensations or impulses. When they arise and are simply witnessed, without identification, fresh attachment or resistance, they can pass away. The self is then no longer continually burdened by them in the same way. Dhyana becomes not merely a method of observing thoughts but a process through which accumulated worldly imprints can gradually be released. With their release comes a sense of becoming clearer, lighter and purer. Purification, in this understanding, does not mean adding something new to the self. It means removing or releasing what has accumulated and obscured the self’s own intrinsic nature.

From Purification to the Pure Self of Liberation

The process can therefore be understood as a gradual movement from worldly experience to subtle imprint, from subtle imprint to witnessed thought or feeling, from witnessing without identification to release, and from release to increasing clarity and lightness. The deeper self does not have to be created through this process. Rather, what obscures it is gradually reduced. This gives liberation a particularly simple meaning: liberation may not be the creation of a new or extraordinary self, but the gradual removal of whatever prevents the already-existing self from being experienced in its own completeness. The final state could therefore be described as the true or pure self of liberation, in which accumulated worldly formations no longer obscure one’s intrinsic being.

The Dhyana Window and the Possibility of Continuous Awareness

Seen this way, the dhyana window may be only the beginning. At first, there may be a strong difference between deep dhyana and ordinary waking life. In dhyana, the deeper structure of being becomes clear, and for some time afterward, as an aftereffect of the practice, accumulated impressions may arise into awareness and be released to dissolve. Outside dhyana, however, worldly impressions and distractions again tend to dominate awareness, covering the deeper structure once more. Repeated witnessing may gradually disburden the self and reduce identification with these formations. The possibility then arises that the clarity experienced inside dhyana can increasingly remain present outside it. This is because shimmering world supports clearer self outside too. Spiritual development would therefore not simply mean repeatedly entering a special meditative state, but gradually carrying the recognition of one’s intrinsic being into ordinary life. The dhyana window could eventually become less of a temporary window and more of a continuous way of being.

This also gives a more precise meaning to the old idea that the world blinds a person to the Self. The problem is not necessarily the existence of the world but our absorption in its gross, differentiated experiences. The self carries the subtle impressions of experience, while ordinary consciousness is continually occupied with the experiences themselves. Deep dhyana allows attention to move beyond this gross level and encounter the subtler structure in which one’s accumulated experience has already been consolidated. Witnessing then allows those formations to arise and pass without renewed identification. Gradually, what remains becomes clearer, lighter and less burdened. Whether this final pure self should be understood metaphysically as an independent spiritual reality is a further philosophical question. The immediate experience, however, is simpler: through deep dhyana, one can experience a dimension of oneself that is normally forgotten, and through sustained witnessing, one may gradually become less obscured by what has accumulated upon it. In this sense, liberation can be understood as not becoming something else, but finally becoming fully present as what one intrinsically is.

What Happens to the Soul After Death? A Dream of Death, Kundalini Yoga, and the Continuity of Spiritual Development

A Dream After the Death of Someone I Knew

A few days ago, a known friend who was also a distant brother took some herbicide and had to be hospitalized for a few days.

I had not met him for years, as I had been living far away from home due to my job and business commitments. When I heard the sad news, I was shocked for a moment. He was such a happy, smiling, and active person. It makes one wonder whether some people manage to hide deep inner depression beneath an outward appearance of happiness and liveliness.

I have now also heard that he had been consuming both cannabis and alcohol, which were reportedly believed to have played a major role in the incident. However being living in spiritual environment and so called high order caste, he also used to go to perform spiritual worships and rituals in people’s homes with other more or less similar team members as part time hobby with little earnings. For one tour of this kind even he was ready but missed due to reluctance of her wife in returning her true home from her maternal home with him where both had gone to celebrate rakshabandhan festival. Was this spiritualism and addiction a lethal combination or was he caught inside dominance of woman related ego. Both appear as the valid psychological possibilities together. He had already warned of consuming something lethal but the family almost ignored it.

The event followed a quarrel between the couple throughout days of journey. After returning home the quarrel continued, and he reportedly beaten his wife and she also attacked back although male is male in strength. Even he hit his mother too in anger while she came to protect her and control him too. So she made them sleep in different rooms separate from each other. At night, God knows from where he got that 500 ml poison bottle and drank entire. In the morning naked due to heating up by poison and blood vomit everywhere. He opposed to be carried to hospital as he was already determined to die but was carried forcefully. Then his partner went back to report to police out of fear. He eventually passed away. When I saw the news on Facebook, I later had a strange dream. I saw a shavayatra moving toward the place of funeral, with people carrying a dead body, but I could not find out who had actually died. The person I had heard about appeared to me as if he were still alive, smiling and happy as he had been earlier. I asked people who had died, but nobody answered me. Instead, everyone seemed to be telling me to remain silent. I could not identify the dead person. At one point I thought that perhaps his younger brother had died because he was not clearly visible and, in the dream, he seemed to be the one showing the greatest grief. Yet this itself became strange, because the person whom I expected to be dead did not appear dead at all.

When the Dream Changed the Meaning of Death

The dream made me think that perhaps death is not as simple as the death of the body. The funeral procession clearly represented physical death, yet I could not locate the person who had supposedly died. The one whom I associated with death appeared alive, smiling, peaceful and recognizable. This contradiction became the central point of the dream for me. I began to feel that perhaps no one dies in the deepest sense merely because the physical body dies. What dies may instead be the bodily form and the world of physical relations connected with that form.

The younger brother’s grief seemed to deepen this interpretation. I had initially guessed that he was the one who had died because he was experiencing the greatest grief. This suggested another possibility: perhaps the person who undergoes a kind of death is not necessarily the one whose body has stopped functioning, but the person who thinks that everything he loved has become zero. When someone believes that the person he loved has completely disappeared, his own inner world can collapse. In that sense, the deepest psychological death may occur in the one who remains behind but becomes overwhelmed by the belief that everything meaningful has been lost.

This does not mean that physical death is unreal. The body certainly dies. The point is different: physical death need not necessarily mean annihilation of the person. The funeral belongs to the body, while the question of what happens to the person or soul belongs to a deeper level of existence.

The Soul May Remain Fully Alive After Bodily Death

I am not thinking only about the way the dead survive in the memories of other people. My meaning is more direct. I am referring to the possibility that the person himself, as a disembodied soul, remains fully alive after bodily death. I have also once experienced what I understood as a dream visitation of a soul, so my understanding of this possibility does not come only from abstract thinking. I experienced something personally that led me to consider the possibility that a person may remain present after the body has died.

My dream after this recent death therefore appeared meaningful to me because the physical body was being carried toward cremation, while the person I associated with that body was nevertheless appearing alive. This created a distinction between the body and the person inhabiting or experiencing through that body. The body may become lifeless, but the soul may not therefore become lifeless.

This gives another meaning to the statement that perhaps no one really dies even after death. It does not have to mean that biological death does not happen. Rather, it can mean that the death of the physical body is not necessarily the death of the person at the level of the soul.

Why the Disembodied Soul Might Feel More Alive

I then began to see another possibility. During embodied life, consciousness is continually surrounded by the distractions of the physical world. The body produces sensations, hunger, thirst, pleasure, pain, fatigue and other needs. The mind is occupied by relationships, social circumstances, memories, desires, fears, reactions and the ordinary stream of thoughts. Much of what we experience as ourselves may therefore be mixed with the activity and limitations of the physical body.

After disembodiment, this entire field of gross physical distraction may no longer dominate consciousness in the same way. If the soul continues after death, it may therefore become more directly aware of its own state of development. Without the same degree of sensory distraction and physical involvement, it could perhaps see and feel its own condition much more clearly.

In that sense, the disembodied soul might be more alive in one respect than the embodied person. This does not mean that it would continue thinking exactly as a living human thinks. Ordinary discursive thoughts, bodily sensations and many emotional reactions may themselves belong to embodied existence. They may be dharmas, or characteristics and activities, of the body-mind condition. The subtler experience of the soul would therefore not necessarily resemble ordinary human thinking.

Instead, the soul may experience reality as a subtle spiritual essence. What is experienced may be less gross, less sensory and less conceptual. It may be closer to direct seeing, feeling or knowing at a spiritual level. What is experienced during embodiment through the body and mind could, after disembodiment, be experienced in a much subtler form.

This is why the smiling and living appearance of the person in my dream seemed significant to me. The dream did not portray him as diminished or extinguished. It portrayed him as alive, even though the funeral procession was taking place. The body seemed to be going toward death, while the person himself did not appear to have become dead.

Physical Death, Psychological Death, and Spiritual Continuity

This way of looking at the dream also suggests three different meanings of death. Physical death is the end of the functioning body. Psychological death can occur in a living person when grief, attachment and the belief in complete loss make the person’s inner world collapse. Spiritual death, however, would be something different altogether. If a soul exists independently of the body and continues after bodily death, then physical death would not automatically mean spiritual death.

This distinction is important because the statement that “no one dies” can otherwise be misunderstood as denying the physical reality of death. I do not mean that. The body dies. What remains open is whether the deepest identity of the person also ends.

My dream cannot prove what happens to a soul after death. It is a personal experience and a source of philosophical reflection rather than scientific evidence. The same applies to my earlier dream visitation. I experienced it as a visitation, but that experience by itself cannot establish the metaphysical fact that souls survive bodily death. Still, an experience can be meaningful without being presented as scientific proof.

Kundalini Yoga and the Continuity of Spiritual Development

This understanding naturally connects with Kundalini Yoga. If consciousness is more than the physical body, then spiritual development may also be more than the temporary development of the body and personality. Ordinary life develops many things that belong to one particular embodiment: physical abilities, possessions, social identities, habits, memories and patterns of thought. These may end or change with the body.

Kundalini Yoga can be understood as working at a deeper level. Its purpose, in this interpretation, is not merely to produce unusual sensations, powers or altered states. It is a process of transforming consciousness and developing subtler levels of awareness. The deeper the transformation, the less it can be understood simply as something belonging to the physical body.

This leads to an important possibility. If the soul continues beyond bodily death, then spiritual development cultivated through Yoga may not necessarily disappear when the body dies. The physical instruments used for the practice belong to one lifetime, but the deeper transformation of consciousness may belong to the soul itself. In a spiritual understanding of rebirth, that development could therefore be carried subtly into the next birth.

The idea is not that every memory or ordinary thought survives in exactly the same form. Rather, what may continue is the deeper spiritual development. A person might lose the particular body, circumstances and personality through which development occurred, while still carrying forward the effect of that development at a subtler level.

In that sense, Yoga can always be seen as helping growth. Even if outward achievements end with the body, genuine inner development may not be lost. What is cultivated at the deepest level may become part of the continuing being.

Why Yoga May Not Require Escape from Society

This also gives another perspective on spiritual practice. One may imagine that leaving society is necessary in order to seek Kundalini or spiritual growth, but that need not follow. Society itself provides the circumstances through which consciousness can be tested and transformed. Relationships, attachment, desire, conflict, responsibility, distraction, loss and ordinary human interaction all reveal the condition of one’s consciousness.

The important question is therefore not simply whether one has escaped society, but what one is developing while living in it. A person may remain in ordinary life while gradually cultivating deeper awareness. The physical and social world can become the field through which spiritual development takes place rather than merely an obstacle to it.

This is also consistent with the central insight of the dream. The ordinary world may contain many distractions, but those same circumstances can become opportunities for growth. Kundalini Yoga does not necessarily require rejecting the world; it may instead involve learning to move through the world without allowing its gross distractions to completely determine consciousness.

What the Dream Means to Me

For me, the deepest meaning of the dream is not simply that a dead person can appear alive in a dream. It is that the dream reversed the ordinary assumption about death. We normally see the body as the person and therefore assume that when the body dies, the person is gone. In the dream, the body was moving toward the funeral, but I could not find the person who had supposedly died. The person was smiling and appeared alive. Nobody would tell me who had died. The one who seemed most visibly affected was the grieving person who believed that someone had been lost.

This makes me wonder whether the tragedy of death belongs primarily to the body and to the attachments surrounding the body, while the deeper person may continue in another condition. Perhaps what appears to us as the end is actually a transition from one mode of experience to another.

The disembodied soul, in this view, does not remain occupied in exactly the same way as the embodied person. Freed from much of the physical world’s distraction, it may experience its own spiritual condition more directly. It may see what it has become more clearly. It may feel reality not through the gross senses and ordinary thought but through a subtler spiritual essence.

And if spiritual development has been cultivated through Kundalini Yoga or another genuine path of inner transformation, perhaps that development does not simply become zero when the body dies. It may continue with the soul and, in a doctrine of rebirth, influence the next embodiment.

This is why I see Yoga as a form of growth that can never be completely wasted. The body is temporary, circumstances are temporary, thoughts are temporary, and personalities are temporary. But if there is something deeper that continues beyond them, then what is developed at that deeper level may have a continuity that ordinary physical achievements do not have.

The funeral procession in my dream therefore came to represent something different from simple annihilation. The body may be carried toward the funeral, but the person may continue. What we call death may be the ending of one form of embodiment rather than the ending of the being itself. And perhaps the greater spiritual task in life is to discover and develop that deeper dimension before the body is finally left behind.

I do not take this dream as proof of a metaphysical fact, nor do I think the death of my friend should be interpreted as something other than the tragedy that it was. His physical death was real, and his suffering before it was real. But the dream led me to ask whether the person who died physically may nevertheless continue in another form of existence, and whether spiritual development can therefore extend beyond a single lifetime.

For me, that possibility gives a deeper meaning to Yoga. It suggests that spiritual practice is not merely an attempt to become more peaceful or powerful within one temporary life. It may be a way of developing what can continue when the temporary body, its distractions and its ordinary mental processes finally fall away. In that sense, perhaps the deepest aim of Kundalini Yoga is not to escape life but to use life to cultivate the part of oneself that may not end with it.

This should not be taken as glorification of death in any way. The point is simply that when worldly activity and its associated mental noise temporarily subside, one may experience a sense of relief and a more direct feeling of the underlying Self. Such relief, however, can be temporary or illusory and should not be confused with genuine spiritual development or realization. The real emphasis is on understanding the nature of worldly impressions and mental noise, and how they can be dissolved through awareness and witnessing.

Kundalini Awakening and Chakras: The River and the Whirlpools

I have found the image of a river and its whirlpools useful for understanding my experience of kundalini and the chakras.

I experience kundalini as an ascending current moving through the central channel, or sushumna, along the spine. A river normally flows onward, but at certain places its water can circulate and form a whirlpool. The water remains part of the same river, yet its movement becomes concentrated and especially noticeable at that point before continuing onward.

In a similar experiential sense, I understand a chakra as a place where the ascending kundalini current seems to gather, circulate, intensify, and become particularly noticeable before continuing upward. The movement through sushumna may remain subtle, while activity at a chakra may appear as pressure, vibration, pulsation, rotation, warmth, expansion, or a distinct feeling of concentrated energy.

Thus, the chakra need not be imagined as a separate energy or independent storehouse. Within this metaphor, it is a more concentrated and noticeable pattern within the same ascending current.

Chakra Meditation and the Flow of Kundalini

The same image helps me understand chakra meditation. A weak whirlpool and a strong whirlpool are both part of the same river; the stronger one simply gathers more water into its circular movement and becomes easier to notice.

Likewise, when meditation strengthens a chakra, the kundalini experience may seem to gather and intensify there, circulate around the centre, and then continue upward through sushumna. The movement from the base may consequently feel stronger, smoother, more organized, and more continuous.

Meditation, therefore, need not be imagined as creating a completely new energy. Within the metaphor, the river is already flowing. Meditation makes a particular whirlpool stronger and the existing current more perceptible.

Different Places and Different Qualities

I have also come to feel that different places can stimulate different chakras—or, more carefully, bring forward qualities traditionally associated with different chakras.

If chakras represent different dimensions of human and spiritual experience, environments can also have different characters. Some places may feel emotional and relational, others devotional, intellectual, practical, social, or deeply contemplative. In the chakra framework, such differences can be described as an environment having an affinity with a particular centre.

The heart chakra is a useful example. A place filled with affection, human interaction, community, devotion, or emotional exchange may bring heart-like qualities more strongly into experience, while a quiet spiritual environment may make contemplative or higher-centre qualities more prominent.

This does not require the belief that a physical location objectively contains a measurable chakra field. People, atmosphere, symbolism, memories, habits, sensory surroundings, relationships, and activities can all influence which qualities become prominent. A place may therefore have a particular quality without containing a literal energetic vortex.

A socially diverse environment can be compared to khichadi: different people bring emotional, intellectual, practical, devotional, social, or worldly qualities, all mixed together. Such a place may stimulate many dimensions simultaneously and can therefore be valuable for someone seeking balance and integration.

Sequential Practice and Integrated Development

Another practitioner may prefer the opposite approach. Someone working sequentially through the chakras may deliberately develop one centre at a time and choose an environment suited to that centre. After that stage is sufficiently developed, another place or practice may be chosen for the next one.

For such a practitioner, a mixed environment may feel like spiritual mix-veg when concentrated work on one particular chakra is desired.

There is therefore no single ideal environment. A person seeking balance may benefit from varied influences, while someone deliberately cultivating one centre may need a focused environment. The same place can help one practitioner and distract another. Its suitability depends partly on what the practitioner is trying to develop at that stage.

My Change of Priority After Awakening

My own experience changed after what I understood as an awakening of the top chakra through kundalini awakening together with self-realisation.

Afterward, I began to feel that the lower chakras no longer needed deliberate strengthening in the same way. Within the yogic framework, my reasoning was that if the same kundalini current had already passed through the lower centres on its way upward and culminated in a powerful awakening at the highest centre, then those centres had already been traversed by the current.

The river-and-whirlpool metaphor made this intuitive. If the river has already passed through several lower whirlpools and finally formed a powerful whirlpool at the top, why must every smaller turbulence below it be made equally strong?

I began to regard the highest chakra as something like the strongest or master whirlpool of the ascending current. My question consequently changed from how to strengthen every smaller whirlpool to how to allow the whole river to flow well and deepen the realization associated with the strongest one.

This did not mean that I considered the lower chakras bad, unnecessary, or unworthy. My feeling was simply that the ascending current had already passed through them, while my attention had moved toward the highest realization.

Why I Preferred Isolation

This change naturally affected my choice of places. After awakening, I preferred relatively isolated environments with strong spiritual and contemplative qualities. I was drawn toward places that seemed to support the higher centre rather than places deliberately selected to stimulate lower centres.

I wanted to deepen and stabilize what had awakened rather than deliberately intensify every lower turbulence again.

Other people sometimes found this preference strange. Looking back, I think part of the misunderstanding came from comparing different stages of development. Someone deliberately cultivating a particular chakra may naturally prefer an environment that stimulates it. I was choosing from the perspective of an experience in which I felt that the current had already reached the top.

Two people can stand beside the same river while being interested in different parts of it. One may study a nearby whirlpool; another may be interested in the direction of the whole river and where it is going. Neither perspective is necessarily wrong. What appears strange from one stage may make sense from another.

Awakening Does Not Mean Complete Development

I now see an important qualification to my earlier understanding.

Experiencing awakening at the highest centre does not necessarily prove that every quality traditionally associated with the lower chakras has become perfectly developed or permanently integrated. Spiritual awakening and complete human maturity are not necessarily identical.

Emotional maturity, relationships, compassion, practical functioning, bodily stability, social adjustment, and other aspects of ordinary life can continue developing after profound spiritual realization.

Therefore, I do not conclude that everyone who experiences awakening at the highest centre should abandon lower-chakra development. Awakening changed my priority; it did not establish a universal rule.

Another practitioner may continue working with lower centres for integration, balance, emotional development, practical life, or other reasons.

Nor must everyone experience the chakras in exactly the same sequence. Some may experience a strong upward movement, some may work with centres individually, some may experience several centres together, and some may not experience chakra sensations in any clearly defined way.

The river-whirlpool model is therefore an explanatory metaphor, not a compulsory map of spiritual development.

Experience, Interpretation and Metaphor

This distinction is especially important when I speak about kundalini.

I am primarily describing something I experienced: an ascending movement, strong sensations, concentration at particular centres, and an awakening associated with the highest centre and self-realisation. I understand these experiences through the traditional yogic language of kundalini, chakras, and sushumna, while the river-and-whirlpool image helps me communicate their structure.

These are three different levels:

  • Experience — what I directly experienced.
  • Yogic interpretation — the framework through which I understand it.
  • Metaphor — the language I use to communicate its pattern.

I can therefore speak firmly about my experience without claiming that the metaphor proves a physical mechanism.

When I say that a stronger chakra attracts more energy, the safest meaning is experiential: attention and sensation may become concentrated there, and the ascending movement may seem to gather around it. Within the yogic framework, this can be described as the chakra drawing more kundalini into itself.

It should not automatically be interpreted as a scientifically established force pulling a measurable substance upward through the spinal cord. It is like stronger whirlpool attracts more water towards it.

Similarly, saying that kundalini passed through the lower chakras before reaching the highest centre describes how I experienced and interpreted the process. It does not prove that every quality traditionally assigned to those centres became perfectly awakened or permanently integrated.

The Limits of the Metaphor

The river analogy is useful precisely when its limits are respected.

Kundalini is not being described as a literal liquid flowing through the spinal cord, and a chakra is not a literal hydraulic whirlpool. A physical whirlpool is a measurable fluid-dynamic phenomenon, whereas a chakra belongs to the traditional subtle-body framework and is being used here to describe spiritual and experiential phenomena.

The metaphor also does not establish that geographical places objectively contain different chakra energies. A place may evoke emotional, devotional, contemplative, intellectual, or other qualities because of its people, atmosphere, symbolism, sensory environment, relationships, habits, memories, and personal associations.

Most importantly, the metaphor describes the pattern of experience, not necessarily its ultimate nature. One person may understand an ascending current as kundalini, another as consciousness or attention, and another through a different spiritual framework.

The value of the metaphor is that it communicates how the experience seems to behave without requiring every part of the image to be taken literally.

What the River Means to Me

The simplest form of my understanding is this:

Kundalini is like a river, and chakras are like whirlpools formed within that river.

The current moves upward, while particular centres become places where the flow seems to gather, circulate, intensify, and become especially noticeable. Meditation may strengthen such a whirlpool. Different environments may bring different qualities into prominence. A mixed environment may suit someone seeking balance, while a focused environment may suit someone developing one centre at a time.

My own path led me toward a different priority after kundalini awakening and self-realisation. Once I experienced the strongest awakening at the highest centre, I felt that the lower centres had already been crossed by the ascending current and became less interested in deliberately strengthening their milder turbulences. I consequently preferred isolation and spiritually intense environments that seemed to support the higher centre.

I would now express this carefully:

Awakening at the highest centre changed my priority; it did not prove that every lower centre becomes permanently unnecessary.

The lower qualities may still need to be expressed, balanced, matured, and integrated in ordinary life. Daily yoga exercises do it well enough by keeping all chakras well energized and balanced. The river may reach its highest whirlpool while still flowing through the whole landscape.

Perhaps this is the deepest value of the metaphor. Before awakening, one may ask which whirlpool needs strengthening. During chakra practice, one may deliberately work with particular centres. After profound awakening, the question may change: instead of continually intensifying individual whirlpools, one may become more concerned with allowing the whole river to flow freely, steadily, naturally, and in harmony with the highest realization.

The metaphor does not require every practitioner to follow the same path. It simply gives me a way to understand how the same kundalini current can appear as a continuous upward movement, an intense concentration at a particular chakra, or, after awakening, as a movement whose deepest significance seems to lie not in any individual centre but in the realization toward which the whole current appears to lead.

Shiva, Shakti and the Cyclic Universe: A Personal Intuition About Branes, Conception and Cosmic Rebirth

From Two Hands to Two Cosmic Branes

I began to understand the idea of a cyclic universe through a very simple image: two hands slowly moving toward each other in position of cosmic prayer, touching, separating, and then coming together again. In some versions of string-inspired cosmology, our universe can be pictured as a three-dimensional brane, or membrane, existing within a higher-dimensional space. Another brane may exist alongside it, and the two can move relative to one another. Instead of imagining the Big Bang simply as an explosion of matter from one point into already existing space, this picture allows us to imagine the changing relationship between the branes themselves as part of the cosmic story. When the two branes separate, the universe can pass through an immense phase of expansion. When they eventually come back together, their collision can produce a new hot, dense beginning, creating a Big Bang-like state. The whole process can then repeat again and again.

The Cosmic Clap: Collision and a New Big Bang

The most striking image is the final clap. After the branes have drifted apart to their maximum distance and the universe has expanded enormously, they begin moving toward each other. Their meeting represents a catastrophic collision, or bounce. In the simplified picture, the old universe is not preserved in its familiar form. Galaxies, stars, planets and other large-scale structures do not simply pass intact into the next cycle. Instead, the previous organized universe is replaced by an extremely hot and energetic state, a kind of plasma inferno in which the familiar structures of the old cosmos have disappeared. From that hot state, the universe can expand and begin forming structure again. Thus the Big Bang is no longer necessarily imagined as the unique beginning of everything. It can be one phase of an endless sequence: separation, expansion, convergence, collision, hot rebirth, and expansion once more. That is the basic appeal of the cyclic or ekpyrotic picture, although it remains a speculative cosmological model rather than an established description of our universe. The “cosmic applause” is simply the repeated meeting of the branes: clap, rebirth, separation, and another clap.

My Shiva-Shakti Intuition

What made this picture especially meaningful to me was that I could see it through an entirely different symbolic language: the ancient idea of Shiva and Shakti. In scriptural traditions, creation is associated with the union of Shiva and Shakti. Shiva can be understood as the still, enduring principle, while Shakti is the dynamic power through which manifestation takes place. I began to see the two branes not merely as two identical physical sheets, but as two complementary symbolic principles. The right and left hands became a simple image of this union. When the hands meet, conception occurs. When they separate, development begins.

This made me think of Shiva as the father principle and Shakti, the mother or goddess, as the creative womb. The union of the two is conception, and the newly conceived universe is then like something growing within a cosmic womb. The important point for me is that the universe does not have to appear fully formed at the moment of conception. After conception comes development. When the two branes separate, Shakti can symbolically be understood as carrying the developing universe, while Shiva remains associated with the essential principle, identity or recognition from which that manifestation arose. In this interpretation, separation is not the opposite of creation. Separation is what allows creation to unfold.

Shakti as the Developing Universe

This makes the female brane, in my symbolic reading, especially interesting. It is not simply another universe identical to the male brane. After the union, Shakti carries the manifested creation and allows it to develop. The universe grows within this cosmic womb, moving from an intensely energetic beginning toward increasing differentiation and complexity. What begins as a hot and chaotic state can eventually become particles, atoms, stars, galaxies, planets and perhaps life. Shiva, by contrast, represents the enduring essence or recognition behind the manifestation. In this picture, Shakti is the movement and development of creation, while Shiva is the principle that remains comparatively still.

This is only a symbolic interpretation; physics does not describe one brane as male and another as female, nor does it assign them the attributes of Shiva and Shakti. The physical model and the spiritual symbolism belong to different levels. What I find meaningful is the structural resemblance between the two pictures: union, creation, separation, development and return.

The Return of Shakti and the Death of the Universe

The idea becomes even more interesting when the universe reaches old age. After a vast period of development and expansion, the universe can be imagined as moving toward exhaustion. In my intuition, Shakti then begins to return toward Shiva. She does not return carrying the old universe as a fully functioning world. The recognizable universe is almost dead. Its galaxies, stars and other structures have lost their former organization, and what remains is increasingly reduced to underlying energetic potential. Yet this does not mean that everything has become meaningless residue. The remains of the old universe can be imagined as carrying the potential for another beginning.

This gives the reunion a different meaning. The approaching Shakti is like a cosmic mother returning to Shiva with the exhausted remains of their previous creation. The purpose is not to preserve the old universe in its previous form, but to allow its remaining essence, now concentrated in energetic form, to participate in another conception. The old universe therefore ends as a recognizable world but survives, in this symbolic picture, as potential. The new universe does not emerge as a completely unrelated event. Its birth is connected to the death and dissolution of the previous cycle.

Conception, Growth, Death and Rebirth

Seen this way, the entire cosmic process becomes almost like one continuous act of reproduction at the scale of the universe. Shiva and Shakti unite, conception occurs, and then they separate. Shakti carries and develops the universe. The universe expands, differentiates, lives through its vast history and eventually approaches death. Shakti then returns toward Shiva carrying the dying creation in a reduced energetic form. Their reunion becomes both dissolution and the preparation for another conception. The old manifestation disappears, but the creative process begins again.

The cycle can therefore be understood in a very simple sequence: union is conception, separation is gestation, expansion is life, aging is exhaustion, return is dissolution, and reunion is rebirth. Then the hands separate again, and the whole process begins once more.

Between Physics and Metaphor

I would not claim that this proves Shiva and Shakti are the physical explanation of brane cosmology, or that ancient scriptures scientifically predicted modern string theory. That would go beyond what either tradition can establish. The brane collision model is a speculative idea in theoretical physics, while the Shiva-Shakti framework is a spiritual and metaphysical language. My point is different. When I placed the two pictures beside each other, I found a striking pattern: two complementary principles come together, something is conceived, creation develops through separation, the manifested world eventually dissolves, and the remaining potential returns to the source for another beginning. My interpretation is closely aligned with the creation symbolism described in the scriptures, particularly the Shiva Purana, where Shiva and Shakti are understood as father and mother in relation to the origin and manifestation of the universe as a fetus growing in cosmic womb.

What began for me as a simple image of two hands coming together therefore became a much larger intuition about the universe. The cosmic clap is no longer merely a collision. Symbolically, it is conception through the death of the previous creation. The separation of the hands is not merely distance; it is the opening of the cosmic womb. And the return is not simply destruction. It is the movement of Shakti back toward Shiva with the almost dead universe, carrying whatever remains of its energetic potential toward a new union. In that sense, the universe becomes a repeating rhythm of union and separation, manifestation and dissolution, death and rebirth: an eternal cosmic cycle in which every ending is also the preparation for another beginning.

Entropy, Kundalini and Higher Order: My Journey Beyond Social Order

From Social Order to Inner Order

There was a time when I began to feel that the order in which I was living was not the deepest order available to me. Ordinary life seemed largely organized around identity, status, ambition, possessions, reputation, social expectations and accepted ways of thinking. I gradually moved beyond some of this superficial order and entered a different field of inquiry through nonduality, karmayoga, Sharir Vigyan Darshan and what I call quantum darshan. Along this journey I experienced awakenings, nirvikalpa dhyana, peace and wisdom. From outside, this might have appeared as leaving one order behind, but inwardly it felt more like the loosening of one structure and the emergence of another.

Only later did entropy become useful to me as a metaphor for this transition. I do not mean that consciousness acquired measurable thermodynamic entropy. Entropy in physics has a precise scientific meaning. I use it only to describe the loosening of an existing organization: when its constraints weaken, attachment to its established arrangement decreases and a wider field of possibilities opens.

Entropy, therefore, should not simply be equated with disorder. A high-entropy state is not necessarily bad, chaotic or inferior, just as low entropy is not automatically better. The meaningful sequence is not entropy produces higher order, but an existing order loosens, possibilities widen, and another organization may or may not emerge.

Social Order and Kundalini

Social order is useful. It provides stability, responsibility, cooperation and continuity. But it can also become bound to ego. Status, ambition, possessions, reputation, comparison and social approval may create an outwardly organized life while leaving a person inwardly governed by fear, attachment or the need for recognition.

Likewise, someone who departs from conventional society may appear disordered while undergoing genuine inner transformation. Neither conformity nor rebellion proves spiritual realization.

This is especially important with Kundalini. Leaving society does not itself guarantee Kundalini awakening, meditation, realization or wisdom. One person may withdraw and discover deeper spiritual order; another may become isolated, unstable or attached to a new spiritual ego. The old structure may disappear without a better one replacing it.

My own experience therefore should not be treated as a universal formula. What mattered in my journey was not merely moving away from superficial social order, but what followed: spiritual inquiry, meditation, awakenings, nirvikalpa dhyana, peace, wisdom and my continuing exploration of nonduality, karmayoga, Sharir Vigyan Darshan and quantum darshan.

Detached Participation

Because of this, I increasingly see value in remaining connected with society while becoming inwardly detached from its superficial pressures. One can continue working, maintaining relationships and fulfilling responsibilities without being psychologically dependent on status, possessions, reputation or approval.

At the same time, one can associate with sincere Kundalini yogis, meditators and spiritually oriented people. I think of this as a secondary order within the primary social order: ordinary society continues to provide practical stability, while a second field develops around meditation, spiritual inquiry, discipline and practice.

This allows spiritual exploration without requiring complete social withdrawal. It also shows that greater freedom does not have to mean greater isolation.

The Water Cycle as a Metaphor

The water cycle gives me a natural image for this process. Water in the ocean has a recognizable large-scale organization. Through evaporation, it leaves that arrangement and becomes dispersed in the atmosphere. Later, cooling and condensation may bring it into droplets and clouds, contributing to rain, rivers, groundwater and the wider hydrological cycle.

The point is not that entropy creates clouds. It does not. The point is that water can leave one form of organization and later participate in another.

But there is an important limitation: vapour does not necessarily become a rain-bearing cloud. It may condense as dew or follow another pathway. Likewise, when a person loosens the structure imposed by conventional social conditioning, the resulting freedom may lead toward meditation, Kundalini practice and deeper realization—or toward confusion and fragmentation.

Dissolution is therefore an opening of possibilities, not a guarantee of evolution.

The water analogy is only structural, not literal. Water forms collective structures through physical processes, while human beings form spiritual communities through consciousness, relationships and shared purposes. Yet both illustrate that leaving an earlier arrangement does not mean remaining permanently dispersed.

The Scientific Boundary

The thermodynamic analogy must remain limited. Local organization can emerge within larger processes in which total entropy increases. Clouds and living organisms can display considerable structure while participating in processes involving entropy production. Thus entropy and ordinary “disorder” are not simple opposites.

This does not scientifically prove Kundalini, nonduality or spiritual evolution, nor do my experiences establish a physical law of consciousness. The scientific and spiritual levels must remain distinct.

The legitimate connection is only the structural one: an existing organization can loosen, a wider range of possibilities can open, and another organization can subsequently emerge.

The Pattern I See

The process can therefore be expressed as:

existing social order → loosening of identification → wider freedom → spiritual association and practice → possible deeper order → integration

But another outcome is possible:

existing social order → escape without deeper organization → fragmentation → loss of outer and inner order

The water cycle expresses the same structural possibility:

ocean → evaporation → atmospheric dispersion → condensation or another pathway → cloud, dew, rain or another state

Neither sequence guarantees its final stage.

My own journey taught me, therefore, not to romanticize either conformity or escape. One can leave society and find nothing higher; one can remain within society and become inwardly free. What matters is not the external form but the organization of life that emerges within it.

For the seeker of Kundalini, the wiser approach may be detached participation: remain connected enough to society to preserve useful outer order, detached enough to gain inner freedom, and connected enough with genuine practitioners to nurture deeper practice.

The central insight is not that entropy is good or that disorder produces Kundalini. It is that the dissolution of one order can open the possibility of another. The loosening is only the opening. If a higher order emerges, it is revealed by what becomes reorganized afterward.

The highest possibility is therefore not society versus Kundalini, or order versus entropy, but a deeper order capable of containing both.

How Worship of Different Gods Can Purify Different Emotions and Prepare the Mind for Nondual Meditation and Kundalini Yoga

Happy Krishna Janmashtami Festival to All

Different Gods as Different Doors of Emotional Surrender

I have been looking at worship of gods and goddesses in a somewhat different way. I do not see all idols only as objects to whom one offers flowers, prayers and devotion. I also see them as different symbolic forms through which different kinds of emotions can be surrendered. The human shape, face and familiar stories of a deity make this easier for the mind. An emotion is otherwise invisible and difficult to hand over to something abstract, but when I stand before a recognizable divine form, I can consciously place a particular class of emotions, memories and experiences before that form. The idol therefore becomes a practical meeting point between my personal emotional life and a larger spiritual symbol.

My experience with Hanuman made this especially clear to me. I stood in front of Hanuman and surrendered all kinds of emotions and incidents connected with bravery. I did not surrender only the idea of courage. I surrendered the emotional burden associated with being brave, the memories of situations in which bravery had been expressed, and the feelings that had gathered around those experiences. After doing this I felt quite relieved and disburdened. This was important because it showed me that surrender does not necessarily mean destroying a quality. I was not trying to lose courage or become weak. I was trying to release my attachment to carrying all the psychological material connected with courage.

This idea then became broader. Hanuman can be one form for one class of emotional material, but other gods and goddesses can serve as suitable forms for other classes. In this way, worship need not be psychologically identical every time. The particular deity gives the mind a particular symbolic direction.

Lakshmi, Rama, Shiva and Vishnu as Different Emotional Purifiers

For me, Lakshmi can become a focus for purification of money-related emotions. Money carries many kinds of psychological material: greed, fear, insecurity, pride, attraction, competition, status-consciousness and anxiety about losing what one has. Instead of allowing all these feelings to remain mixed together inside the mind, I can bring them before Lakshmi and surrender them. The purpose is not to reject money or prosperity. It is to reduce the emotional burden and attachment surrounding them so that money can remain a practical part of life without becoming an excessive psychological identity.

Rama can similarly become a focus for emotions connected with superiority, righteousness and even sattvik identity. This is important because not every difficult emotion is obviously negative. A person can become proud of being good, pure, disciplined, spiritual or morally superior. Even sattvik qualities can therefore become material for ego. By surrendering these emotions before Rama, I can retain the quality of righteousness without carrying the feeling that I am superior because of it.

Shiva, in my framework, can become a focus for tamasic emotions and heavier inner tendencies. This includes dullness, darkness, destructive impulses, heaviness and other forms of emotional material that may be difficult to approach directly. Instead of constantly fighting such tendencies mentally, I can place them before Shiva as a symbolic act of surrender and purification.

Vishnu can represent another kind of emotional burden, especially that connected with hard work, preservation, responsibility and the effort required to continue one’s worldly duties. Work itself is not the problem, just as courage itself is not the problem. The burden may come from attachment to achievement, pressure, exhaustion, pride in one’s effort or the feeling that everything depends personally on me. Surrendering this material can allow work to continue while reducing the psychological weight carried with it.

Radha and Krishna, Kali, Brahma and Ganesha

Radha and Krishna can serve as a focus for love-related emotions. Love can be beautiful, but it can also become attachment, longing, possessiveness, jealousy, fear of separation, emotional dependence and repeated mental involvement with another person. By bringing these emotions before Radha and Krishna, the aim can be to purify the emotional intensity without rejecting love itself. Love may remain, but the clinging around love can become lighter.

Kali provides a particularly powerful symbolic form for emotions connected with danger, fear, threat and intense vulnerability. When the mind carries danger-related emotions, it can remain prepared for something bad even when no immediate danger exists. Bringing such emotions before Kali can create a strong symbolic act in which fear and the feeling of threat are consciously surrendered. The terrifying form itself can make this surrender psychologically meaningful because it does not require fear to be hidden or softened before approaching the symbol.

Brahma can become a focus for knowledge-related emotions. Knowledge is valuable, yet knowledge can also create pride, intellectual superiority, attachment to being right, the need to display understanding and an identity built around knowing. Surrendering knowledge-related emotions before Brahma does not mean rejecting knowledge. It means trying to separate knowledge from the ego that can grow around knowledge.

Ganesha can become useful for another category of emotions, including feelings connected with one’s appearance, obstacles, embarrassment, unfavorable self-image or the sense that one’s face or body has something wrong with it. A form that itself differs from ordinary human appearance can become a particularly meaningful symbol here. Instead of remaining ashamed of an appearance-related feeling or repeatedly fighting it, I can bring it into the presence of Ganesha and surrender the emotional burden attached to it.

There can naturally be many more such associations. The list does not have to end with the major deities. Different forms, stories and qualities can provide different symbolic containers for different emotional burdens. What matters is the relationship between the deity and the emotional material being surrendered.

Worship as Emotional Purification Rather Than Mere Ritual

In this understanding, idol worship becomes a practical method of emotional purification. Different gods do not necessarily have to be understood as mechanically removing different emotions from the mind. Rather, the traditional qualities and forms associated with them help the mind organize and surrender different kinds of psychological material. One form may naturally draw courage-related emotions, another wealth-related emotions, another love, another fear, another knowledge, another ego connected with virtue, another heaviness and so on.

The physical idol itself is only the outer support. The deeper process happens in the mind. I stand before the form, recognize what I have been carrying, consciously offer it, and allow myself not to hold it so tightly. The emotional burden may then become weaker. Repeated practice can make this process more familiar. The emotions do not necessarily vanish permanently, and there is no requirement that the mind become emotionless. What changes is the amount of unnecessary attachment, repetition and identification surrounding them.

This is why I find the word purification useful. A purified mind does not mean a blank mind or a mind incapable of strong feeling. It means a mind in which emotions can arise without every emotion becoming another object of possession, struggle or identity. Courage can remain courage without becoming a burden. Knowledge can remain knowledge without becoming superiority. Love can remain love without becoming excessive attachment. Money can remain useful without becoming the center of psychological security. Hard work can continue without carrying endless pressure. Spirituality itself can remain without creating the feeling of being better than others.

From Emotional Clearing to Nondual Contemplation

Once emotional burdens have been eased, I can see how the mind may become more suitable for meditation. A mind constantly occupied by unresolved memories, fears, pride, attachment, achievement and personal stories has less attention available for subtle contemplation. When some of this material is surrendered, the mind can feel quieter and less crowded.

This gives a natural place to the nondual practices that I follow, including what I call sharirvig darshan and quantum darshan. These forms of contemplation require a different quality of attention from ordinary emotional thinking. The less the mind is pulled around by personal emotional material, the easier it may become to stay with a subtle idea, observation or contemplative image. In this sense, devotional worship and nondual meditation do not have to be competing paths. Worship can prepare the emotional ground on which deeper contemplation becomes easier.

The idol also has another role here. The physical form provides a stable image for the mind. By repeatedly looking at the face, posture and overall form of the deity, the image may gradually become established inwardly. With concentration, the physical idol is no longer the only place in which the form exists for the practitioner. The image can become increasingly available in meditation. Emotional surrender may make this easier because a less burdened mind is less easily distracted.

Thus there can be a practical progression: emotion is recognized, emotion is surrendered, emotional burden becomes lighter, the mind becomes cleaner, attention becomes steadier, the meditation image becomes stronger, and deeper contemplation becomes possible.

How This May Support Kundalini Yoga

I therefore see worship of gods and goddesses as potentially supportive of Kundalini yoga. I do not mean that worship automatically raises Kundalini or that a particular idol mechanically produces a particular energetic effect. The connection is more practical and experiential. Kundalini-oriented meditation requires sustained attention, inner stability and the ability to remain with subtle bodily and mental experiences. Emotional turbulence can make this difficult. Emotional purification may therefore help prepare the mind for the practice.

When different emotional burdens are consciously surrendered through different divine forms, the mind may become less entangled in its own history. This does not mean abandoning ordinary life. In fact, the qualities represented by the deities can remain fully available. Hanuman can represent courage, Vishnu work and preservation, Lakshmi prosperity, Rama righteous conduct, Shiva the transformation of heavy tendencies, Radha and Krishna love, Kali confrontation with danger, Brahma knowledge and Ganesha the overcoming of obstacles and difficult self-image. The goal is not to get rid of these qualities but to reduce the emotional ownership and burden associated with them.

This also connects with ego. A positive quality can become a source of bondage when it turns into identity. “I am brave,” “I am knowledgeable,” “I am spiritual,” “I am righteous,” “I am successful,” or “I am the one who works hardest” can all become heavy identities. Surrender allows the quality to remain while softening the claim of ownership around it. The person can still be brave when bravery is needed, work when work is needed, love when love is present and use knowledge when knowledge is useful, without constantly carrying the psychological demand to prove that identity.

The Spiritual Symbol and the Quantum Idea

I also connect this understanding with the physical nature of idols. An idol is made of matter, just as the human body and the rest of the physical world are made of matter. From a philosophical point of view, this can be contemplated as part of a common physical reality. I sometimes use the language of quantum particles to think about this deeper commonality. The human form of the deity then becomes a practical appearance through which consciousness relates to something that, in a deeper philosophical view, is not fundamentally separate from the rest of existence.

At the same time, I find it important to distinguish my contemplative interpretation from a scientific claim. It is reasonable to say that physical idols consist of ordinary matter and ultimately of physical constituents described by physics. It is not an established scientific fact that particular gods or specific emotions are literally particular quantum particles. The quantum language can therefore be kept as a philosophical or meditative way of understanding unity and interconnectedness rather than presented as proof of a specific religious interpretation.

This distinction does not reduce the value of the experience. The practical effect can still be meaningful. A symbol can change the way the mind relates to an emotion without requiring a scientific theory to validate every aspect of the symbol. The relief I experienced before Hanuman is a direct example. I surrendered my bravery-related emotions and incidents and felt lighter afterward. That experience itself is the foundation of my understanding.

However, as per Quantum Darshan every emotion resides in quantum particle. It is other thing they are not aware of them, leave alone attachement to these. That is why ancient saying god resides in every particle. They even not knowing quantum science knew its spiritual essence it seems. So it is like technique to become detached with all emotions by surrendering them to quantum particles. Different outer forms like different masks applied to them.

All emotions are basically in nature and we have only learnt these from there. Idol worship is like returning that all emotional burden back to nature that have been obtained from it.

Many Divine Forms, One Movement Toward Inner Freedom

Seen as a whole, my understanding of god worship is therefore not about choosing one deity as the only correct emotional purifier. Different forms can provide different doors into the same larger process. Lakshmi can help me examine money-related attachment. Rama can help me soften superiority and even pride in sattvik qualities. Shiva can help me surrender heavy and tamasic tendencies. Vishnu can receive the burdens attached to work and responsibility. Radha and Krishna can receive love-related attachment. Kali can receive fear and danger-related emotions. Brahma can receive knowledge-related pride. Ganesha can receive emotions connected with obstacles and unfavorable self-image. Hanuman can receive bravery-related experiences and the burden of identifying too strongly with courage. Many other deity forms can naturally occupy similar roles according to their qualities and according to the particular emotional material of the practitioner.

The deeper movement is the same: what has been psychologically carried as “mine” can be consciously surrendered. When this is repeated, the mind may become cleaner and less burdened. A cleaner mind may contemplate nonduality more easily. A steadier mind may develop meditation imagery more strongly. Deeper meditation may then provide a better foundation for Kundalini-oriented practice.

For me, this makes idol worship far more than an external religious activity. It can become a practical psychology of surrender. The idol gives a face to the abstract, the deity gives a symbolic direction to the emotion, surrender reduces the burden of personal ownership, and the resulting lightness can prepare the mind for deeper contemplation. I do not have to destroy my emotions, nor do I have to destroy the qualities associated with them. I can allow courage, love, knowledge, work, prosperity, righteousness and strength to remain while surrendering the unnecessary psychological weight around them.

My experience before Hanuman gave me the clearest starting point for this understanding. I stood before the image, gave away the emotions and incidents connected with bravery, and felt relief and disburdenment. From there I began to see a larger possibility: perhaps every divine form can become a doorway for surrendering a different emotional burden. Through many such doors, the mind can gradually become lighter. And when the mind becomes lighter, it may become more capable of the stillness, imagery, nondual contemplation and subtle awareness through which my meditation and Kundalini practice can continue to deepen.

Why Is Kundalini Called Mystical? When Awakening Happens Without Trying

The Continuous Meditation Image and the Movement of Prana

My meditation experience has led me to look at the relationship between prana, kundalini, breathing, nondual contemplation and the inner meditation image in a different way. The most striking feature is the continuous and uniformly shining quality of the meditation image. It does not remain like an ordinary thought or a weak mental picture. At times it becomes so stable, bright and lively that it seems almost like a physical object seen with open eyes. This raises a basic question: what keeps such an inner image continuously alive?

One possible explanation, within the traditional yogic understanding of prana, is that the major support is not ordinary breathing but an upward movement of prana from the muladhara toward the brain. Breathing may still play a role, but it appears to become secondary when sushumna is active. In ordinary functioning, breathing participates in the distribution and movement of prana throughout the body. Exhalation, in particular, seems to be associated in my experience with a downward movement. When this downward movement becomes stronger, the meditation image can become somewhat dimmer, as though some of the energy supporting the image has moved away from the brain.

But when sushumna becomes active and prana is experienced as continuously rising through the spine, the situation seems different. Kundalini energy appears to provide prana to the whole body according to need while its movement is upward through the central pathway, energizing the different chakras and their corresponding functions. It therefore does not seem necessary for this same energy to be repeatedly pushed downward in the way ordinary pranic distribution appears to occur with ordinary breathing. The kundalini energy rising up is giving proportionately equal nourishment to all chakras and their corresponding organs so energy do not need to be moved down frequently from the brain. This may explain why breathing naturally becomes slower or may even pause during deep activation of sushumna.

The experience becomes especially interesting when ordinary breathing cannot slow down. During physical work, stress or other conditions requiring increased respiration, breathing may remain active and its downward effect may still be present. Yet if sushumna is strongly activated and prana is continuously flowing upward, the meditation image may not become significantly dimmer. The downward movement associated with breathing is then apparently unable to overcome the continuous upward supply. The image can remain present, more or less continuously, because it is constantly being supported by the upward current.

From this perspective, a continuously present meditation image could become an experiential indication of an increasingly stable meditative state. If the upward movement through sushumna is sufficiently established, the image may remain continuously present in varying degrees of brightness, approaching what can traditionally be called savikalpa samadhi. This is not meant to establish scientifically that prana literally moves in this way, but to describe the relationship as it is experienced within the yogic framework.

Nondual Contemplation and the Felt Energy Vacuum in the Brain

Another part of the experience has become equally important. Nondual contemplation produces a particular peacefulness and calmness. It is not simply the intellectual acceptance of a philosophical idea. When contemplation becomes deep, ordinary mental activity seems to become quieter, and there is a distinct feeling of spaciousness or even an energy vacuum in the brain.

This felt vacuum may have an important role in the upward movement of kundalini. When ordinary mental activity becomes quiet, there seems to be less energy occupied by scattered thoughts, emotional reactions and ordinary subject-object thinking. The quietness may therefore allow, or in the traditional interpretation even draw, more kundalini energy upward from the base toward the brain.

This seems to explain why a meditation image can become particularly lively during nondual contemplation of sharirvigyan darshan, quantum darshan or another nondual vision. Nondual contemplation first produces the quiet and peaceful condition. That quietness seems to create a receptive space in the brain, after which the upward energetic movement becomes stronger and the established meditation image becomes more vivid.

The process can therefore be understood as a cycle: nondual contemplation produces stillness; stillness allows stronger upward movement; the upward movement makes the inner image brighter and more alive; the bright image stabilizes attention; and stabilized attention further deepens the stillness. The process reinforces itself rather than depending upon deliberate mental effort at every moment.

The term “energy vacuum” is useful for describing the experience, but it should not be mistaken for an established physiological mechanism. What can be directly reported is the felt peacefulness, quietness, spaciousness and associated energetic movement. Whether that experience is ultimately explained through prana, kundalini, neurological activity, attention, interoception, conditioning or a combination of these remains an open question.

Why Does Only One Meditation Image Become So Luminous?

This raises a more difficult question. If nondual contemplation and the upward movement of kundalini increase the energy available in the brain, why does only one preassigned meditation image become continuously bright and lively? Why do other thoughts not become equally vivid?

A possible answer is that the meditation image has become a specially established pathway through long and regular practice. Ordinary thoughts are temporary and associative. One thought produces another, and the mind constantly moves from one subject to another. A deliberately practiced meditation image is different. It is singular, predetermined, repeatedly brought back into awareness and strengthened through thousands of acts of concentration.

Thus, when the mind becomes quiet and more energetic, the established meditation image may be the easiest form through which that intensified activity can express itself. The energy may not literally be restricted to one image; rather, that image may have become the most strongly conditioned and stable representation available.

In this sense, prana may provide the power while meditation provides the channel. Repeated practice may have created a pathway of least resistance. This can explain why a random thought such as what to eat later does not suddenly acquire the same luminosity as the chosen meditation image. The random thought has no comparable stability, repetition or intentional reinforcement.

There is also an important difference in the quality of perception. Ordinary imagination is usually dim, unstable, fragmentary and dependent upon deliberate effort. The meditation image I experience can become continuous, uniformly bright and perceptually alive. It can approach the quality of seeing an object through open physical eyes. This is not simply a matter of imagining the object more clearly. It represents a change from deliberate visualization toward a more spontaneous and self-sustaining inner perception. However at times other images also can intensify like lively physical object but I do not give attention to those and in a way do not like them so energy from them again shifts to meditation image.

The strongest explanation may therefore involve both energy and conditioning. The upward energetic state supplies intensity, while long practice supplies the established form. The image becomes the point where the two meet.

Kundalini and the Long Association with the Meditation Image

There may be an even deeper reason for this special relationship. Kundalini may have become associated with the meditation image itself through the united contemplation of both over a long period of daily practice. The image was not practiced in isolation. It was repeatedly encountered in a meditative state involving concentration, inwardness, nondual contemplation and the experience of an upward kundalini movement through the spine.

If these elements have been repeatedly experienced together, they may eventually become strongly linked. Then, when the image first appears during nondual contemplation, even if only weakly, its appearance may itself become a trigger for the familiar upward movement of kundalini. The image becomes brighter; the upward movement becomes stronger; the stronger movement makes the image more stable; and the stable image draws attention still more completely.

The resulting process can be represented simply as image, upward current, brighter image, stronger concentration, stronger upward current, and still brighter image. The important point is that the image may no longer be merely an object of thought. It may have become a doorway into the entire meditative configuration developed through repeated practice.

This also explains why the experience can be directly felt as a continuity from the base to the image. The movement is not experienced merely as an abstract belief in kundalini. There can be a bodily sense beginning at the muladhara, moving upward through the spinal region and reaching toward the brain or the inner image. From the standpoint of phenomenology, this is a spatially organized experience: the energetic movement seems to have a beginning, a pathway and a point of expression.

It is still important to distinguish direct experience from interpretation. The direct experience is the sensation of an upward movement associated with the meditation image. Calling that movement kundalini, or saying that prana literally travels through a physical channel along the spine, is a traditional interpretation of the experience rather than something established by modern physiology. Keeping this distinction makes the account stronger rather than weaker.

When I enter a familiar place or meet people already associated with my meditation or meditation image, the experience may begin quite distinctly. More often it is better with loving environment that helps get peaceful rest with spine erect and relaxed breath. At first, kundalini seems to rise clearly, felt as a blissful sensation moving upward along the spine—sometimes as one continuous movement and sometimes in stages, almost as if it were passing from one chakra to another. After some time, however, the upward movement may become unnoticeable. An hour or so later, I may no longer consciously feel any movement along the spine, yet the meditation image remains vividly luminous in the brain, accompanied by a deep sense of bliss and peace. Means the kundalini energy prepared the stage for sometime for expression of meditation image there.

The bliss associated with the initial upward surge can resemble sexual pleasure, but it feels different in quality—more refined, diffuse, and inward, as though the familiar sexual sensation has been transformed into a subtler and more pervasive form of bliss. I can describe this as a subjective resemblance to sexual pleasure without claiming that the experience is literally sexual or that a specific physiological process of sexual energy moving upward has been established. But contraction and shrinkage of lower organs with feel of their relief from stress and burden by pushing something up proves this thing experientially.

The Role of the Third Eye and Ajna Chakra

The experience then suggests another component: the role traditionally attributed to the third eye or Ajna chakra. The meditation image does not merely become brighter somewhere vaguely inside the mind. It becomes exceptionally clear and immediate in the region associated in yogic traditions with Ajna.

From this perspective, savikalpa samadhi can be understood as the united contribution of several factors rather than as the result of one factor alone. The regularly practiced meditation image provides the established object. Nondual contemplation produces peacefulness, quietness and a reduction of ordinary mental activity. Kundalini or the upward movement of prana supplies the increasing energetic intensity. Ajna, or the third-eye center in the traditional model, provides the focal center through which the inner object becomes exceptionally clear.

This combination can explain why the image of Dadaguru can become so vivid. It is not merely a picture that has been remembered. It has been practiced repeatedly and associated with the deepest meditative conditions. When nondual contemplation quiets the mind and the upward movement becomes strong, the image can appear almost independently of deliberate effort. At its most developed, it can become continuous, uniformly luminous, stable and lively, with an immediacy approaching physical seeing with open eyes. Even can awaken providing self-realization glimpse in exceptionally favourable environment and heightened energy.

This is where the distinction between ordinary visualization and savikalpa samadhi becomes important. Ordinary visualization still requires the meditator to construct and maintain an image. In the experience being described here, however, the image increasingly seems to maintain itself. Attention no longer has to continuously manufacture it. It becomes a stable inner object around which the mind becomes unified.
This is, in a sense, the special quality of kundalini—the blissful and deeply absorbing state can be achieved deliberately through Tantra, but it can also happen spontaneously. The ordinary meditator may struggle for years, even for a lifetime, simply to maintain a meditation image steadily, let alone reach awakening. What kundalini seems to do spontaneously is therefore not something that can be reproduced so easily by other methods, even when those methods are practiced deliberately and for a very long time.
The difference is important. With ordinary meditation, there can be a continuous struggle to hold the image, bring the wandering mind back, and prevent the visualization from fading. In the experience associated with kundalini, the process can appear to reverse itself: instead of the practitioner constantly maintaining the image, the image seems to become self-sustaining. It shines by itself, attention gathers around it, and the mind enters a state of bliss, peace, and increasing unity without the same continuous effort.
This may be one reason the idea of kundalini appears so extensively in the spiritual literature of the world. Sometimes it is described directly, but much more often it may be expressed indirectly through symbolic stories, verses, sacred figures, ritual practices, images of ascent, inner transformation, divine union, death and rebirth, or the awakening of a hidden power. The language changes from tradition to tradition, and these accounts should not automatically be treated as literal descriptions of the same physiological process. Yet the remarkable persistence of such imagery suggests that human beings have repeatedly tried to describe experiences in which something deeper than deliberate mental effort seems to take over the process of transformation. That is why kundalini is so often termed mystical. But what exactly is mystical about it? If kundalini is understood as a process in which much of the work of awakening can happen spontaneously, without the meditator deliberately producing each stage, then the term seems especially appropriate.

Mystical does not necessarily mean something that has no scientific or physiological basis. It can simply point to something extraordinary that seems to unfold by itself, beyond the ordinary capacity of deliberate effort. A meditator may spend years struggling to maintain concentration, stabilize an inner image, deepen absorption, or transform consciousness. Yet in an experience attributed to kundalini, some of these processes can appear to happen spontaneously, sometimes with remarkable speed and intensity.

What could seem more extraordinary than awakening itself occurring in this way? The remarkable feature is not that kundalini must be a supernatural force, nor that its effects cannot ultimately have physiological or psychological explanations. The mystery lies in the phenomenology: something that normally appears to require enormous effort seems to organize and propel itself from within.

In that sense, kundalini can be called mystical without making an anti-scientific claim. Its mystery is not necessarily that it violates physiology, but that it can produce such profound changes in consciousness with such apparent spontaneity. The experience can feel as though the practitioner is no longer doing the awakening; rather, awakening itself has begun to do the work.

As told above, the term savikalpa remains appropriate within this framework precisely because there is still a particular object. The experience is not completely objectless. There is still the meditation image of Dadaguru, but ordinary mental fluctuation has become greatly reduced and the object has acquired extraordinary clarity and stability.

At the same time, the presence of a bright inner image alone should not automatically be equated with savikalpa samadhi in the classical sense. Traditionally, savikalpa samadhi refers to a deeper transformation in the relationship between awareness, mental activity, and the meditation object.

One can have a bright image of one’s puppy or buffalo or even a beautiful flower or a stone, but how can we call that meditation simply because the image is bright and vivid? There are other qualities of meditation as well, such as nonduality, detachment, bliss, humility, true and selfless love, and the rise of kundalini. These qualities make a meditation image much more spiritually significant. A person who develops such qualities can therefore be considered a better fit for a spiritually oriented meditation image, particularly one associated with a guru, God, or another sacred figure. A Guru, having achieved these qualities through deliberate effort, inspires his followers to cultivate the same qualities in their own lives. Thus, he makes the meditation image further intensify itself in the mind by encouraging the follower to sustain these qualities in daily life. As these qualities are sustained, they further intensify the image, which in turn inspires the follower to embody them even more deeply. This cycle continues, and the image gradually becomes established in the mind, remaining uninterrupted—somewhat like savikalpa samadhi.

Animals or inanimate objects may possess many of these qualities naturally, but they do not possess emotions and cognition in the same way as human beings. In animals, these qualities appear to be largely instinctive or naturally given, whereas in human beings they can be consciously chosen, cultivated, and developed. This gives them greater weight in the context of spiritual practice, because the human being can deliberately direct these qualities toward meditation and awakening. However, as per Patanjali medittion of whatever favourite object can produce samadhi but I think that may take more time than meditation of any spiritual subject. No doubt animals have many spiritual type qualities that is why each god is shown with an animal, so meditation of guru or god with animal seems having synergistic effect. This seems the meaning of god and animal shown together. I also felt this. I largely remain with animals and inside nature during my heightened initial spiritual growth and both awakenings. That’s why most of awakened beings are animal and nature lovers, atleast living in harmonious company with these. Also, animal and nature lovers tend to be more spiritual than others. This is because nonduality is inherent nature of animals and nature. What they do just instinctively to survive, not with any willful dual agenda.

Therefore, the strongest and most accurate statement is that a continuous, luminous image may be an experiential feature associated with a state that resembles or develops toward savikalpa samadhi, rather than by itself proving that the classical state has been attained. The image becomes much more significant when it appears together with the other qualities of meditation—bliss, detachment, nonduality, selfless love, inner stillness, and the spontaneous rise of kundalini.

A Possible Unified Model

Taken together, the experience suggests a unified process. Long practice establishes a particular meditation image as the strongest and easiest inner pathway. Nondual contemplation quiets ordinary thought and creates a profound peacefulness and felt spaciousness in the brain. This quietness appears to make the brain receptive to a stronger upward movement of kundalini from the muladhara through the spine. As that movement reaches the region of the brain and Ajna, the established meditation image becomes increasingly bright, stable and perceptually immediate.

Once the image appears, it may itself reinforce the upward movement because the image has been repeatedly associated with that energetic condition. The process therefore becomes self-reinforcing. A small appearance of the image can initiate a larger upward response; the upward response makes the image brighter; the brighter image holds attention more firmly; and the firmer attention deepens nondual stillness. Breathing may still influence the state, particularly through exhalation and its apparent downward effect, but when sushumna is strongly active, the continuous upward process may become dominant enough that ordinary breathing cannot extinguish the image.

The whole experience can therefore be understood as the convergence of nondual contemplation, kundalini, the practiced meditation image and the Ajna or third-eye focus. None of these elements needs to be considered independently. The meditation image supplies the established form, nonduality provides mental stillness, the upward kundalini experience provides energetic intensity and bliss, and Ajna provides the traditional focal center through which the inner perception becomes exceptionally clear.

The deepest feature of the experience is therefore not simply that an image can be seen in meditation. It is that a particular image, practiced over a long period, can become so deeply associated with stillness and upward energetic movement that it begins to appear with a continuity, uniform brightness and vividness normally associated with direct physical perception. From the yogic perspective, this can be understood as the meeting of prana, kundalini, sushumna and Ajna with a well-established meditation object. From a psychological and neuroscientific perspective, some of the same experience could be approached through learned attention, conditioning, imagery, interoception and changes in ordinary mental activity.

The experience itself, however, remains the starting point. The interpretation can continue to develop without diminishing what was directly observed: the quiet produced by nondual contemplation, the felt movement from the base through the spine, the reduced dependence on ordinary breathing, and above all the transformation of the practiced image of Dadaguru from an ordinary mental representation into a continuous, uniformly shining and unusually lively inner presence.

Third Eye Opening and Awakening: How Breath, Prana and Inner Seeing May Be Connected

The Experience That Led to the Question of the Third Eye

My understanding of the third eye did not begin with the idea of a mystical organ somewhere inside the head. It emerged from observing something much simpler: the difference between sensory experience and purely mental experience, and the remarkable change that can occur when the breath spontaneously pauses. This observation also connects with the larger exploration of sex, breath suspension, kundalini and samadhi, but the present question is much more specific. It concerns what happens to the brightness and continuity of experience when sensory input is present or absent, and why certain states are traditionally associated with the third eye or ajna chakra.

One of the first things I noticed was that there can be a remarkably uniform brightness in ordinary sensory experience even while the breath is running normally. If I look at beautiful scenery, for example, the visual experience remains continuously bright. The breath is moving in and out, yet the scenery does not seem to become darker with every outbreath. The sensory system is continuously receiving information from the external scene, and this continued sensory input appears to keep the corresponding mental formation uniformly alive and bright. The mental image is therefore constantly supplemented by perception itself.

But when the breath spontaneously pauses while looking at beautiful scenery, the experience can become much stronger. The scenery may suddenly feel extraordinarily vivid, stable and blissful. I have referred to this as “breathholding beauty.” The point is not that physically holding the breath creates beauty, but that when the breath naturally pauses, the already beautiful sensory experience can become unusually intense and experiential. The temporary absence of ordinary respiratory movement seems to allow the experience to become more continuous and concentrated.

This observation becomes even more interesting when there is no external sensory object.

Why Pure Thought Reveals the Effect More Clearly

During purely mental thought, when there is no sensory involvement, the darkening effect associated with outbreath becomes more obvious. A thought or mental image has no external sensory stream continuously supplying it with information. There is nothing like the visual scene before the eyes that keeps refreshing the mental formation. The thought therefore has to sustain itself internally, and fluctuations associated with respiration can become more noticeable.

In this sense, sensory experience may conceal something that becomes obvious in purely mental experience. When looking at a scene, the senses continually supplement the mental image. During a thought without sensory involvement, that supplementation is absent. The changing respiratory rhythm can therefore appear more directly related to the changing brightness or stability of the mental formation.

This should be understood as a phenomenological observation rather than an established physiological law. I am describing how the experience appears and the model that arises from it, not claiming that science has established that every exhalation literally darkens a thought. The distinction between experience and its proposed mechanism is important.

Spontaneous Breath Suspension and Uniformly Bright Thought

During energetic ascent, when the breath pauses spontaneously, something different can happen. A mental formation that would ordinarily fluctuate can remain uniformly bright. It can acquire a continuity similar to that of sensory experience, or even to directly seeing something with the eyes open.

This is significant because there may be no external sensory input providing the image. Yet the mental image can remain vivid, stable and continuously present. In the experience, it is as though prana is now doing what sensory input ordinarily does: sustaining the mental formation and keeping it continuously bright.

This gives a possible experiential explanation for why such states can feel like seeing rather than merely thinking. An ordinary thought is something I can know, imagine or construct mentally, but an intensely bright inner formation can have a different quality. It can feel directly experienced, almost as though something is actually being seen. The eyes can remain closed, and yet the experience can have a perceptual intensity comparable to seeing with open eyes.

This is the point at which the traditional idea of the third eye becomes especially interesting.

The Third Eye as Inner Seeing

The third eye does not necessarily have to mean another physical eye or an additional anatomical sensory organ. From this perspective, it can describe the emergence of a mode of inner perception in which prana sustains a mental formation with a continuity and brightness that ordinarily come through sensory input.

Normally, the physical eyes see an external object because sensory information is continuously reaching the brain and contributing to the perceptual experience. In the state I am describing, an internally generated mental image can acquire a similar continuity without depending upon an external sensory object. The experience can therefore resemble direct perception even though the physical eyes remain closed.

This also gives a deeper meaning to the word “awakening.” When a person wakes from ordinary sleep, the physical eyes open and the external world becomes visible. There is a transition from an inward, dreamlike or unconscious condition to a state in which the world is directly perceived. In a somewhat analogous sense, the third eye can be understood as an inner awakening: the physical eyes remain closed, but an internal world becomes directly and intensely perceptible.

The mechanism or process through which this inner “waking up” is experienced can therefore be called the opening or functioning of the third eye. The third eye is not necessarily a separate organ; it is the name given to the capacity for this intensified inner seeing.

Why Ajna Is Called the Third-Eye Chakra

At ajna, there can still be something that resembles an object of perception. There is inner brightness, inner seeing of medtation image, and an experience that can feel almost like direct perception through the senses. This is why ajna is specifically described as the location of the third eye.

The important feature is not merely brightness. Brightness alone would not explain the expression “eye.” The defining feature is the experiential quality of seeing. Something appears before awareness in a way that can resemble an object of perception. It may be an image, a form, a scene or another mental formation, but it is experienced with a directness that goes beyond ordinary intellectual thought.

This experience is also not necessarily mystical. In a broader sense, everyone may have the third eye open to some extent at different times. Human beings constantly experience mental images, thoughts and inner representations without having corresponding physical objects immediately before the senses. Every mental thought therefore has something of the nature of a third eye: it creates an internally experienced object or representation.

The difference is one of degree and intensity. The more a person is intellectually self-contained and inwardly engaged without unnecessary dependence on sensory and worldly stimulation, the more developed this capacity for inner seeing may be. A person who can remain inwardly occupied does not need constant external sensory stimulation to maintain mental activity. In this broad sense, the third eye is not an extraordinary possession belonging only to mystics. It is a capacity already present in ordinary consciousness.

From Ordinary Thought to a Fully Open Third Eye

Every mental thought can therefore be regarded as a very simple form of third-eye functioning. When I think about something that is not physically present, there can still be an internal representation of it. I may see a place in my mind, remember a person’s face, imagine an object or construct an entire scene without looking at anything externally.

Ordinary thought, however, usually does not have the same intensity as external sensory perception. I know that I am imagining it. Its brightness, stability and immediacy are generally weaker than the direct perception of an object before the physical senses.

The third eye can therefore be understood as a continuum rather than an all-or-nothing event. At one end there is ordinary mental imagery and thought. At a stronger level, inner imagery becomes increasingly vivid and independent of sensory support. At the highest level of this particular function, an inner thought or image can become as strong, stable and directly experiential as external sensory perception. In that sense, the third eye is fully open when inner seeing reaches the intensity of actual sensory seeing.

This also explains why third-eye experiences do not have to be dramatic visions. The essential characteristic is the quality of perception. A mental formation may become exceptionally clear without necessarily producing a supernatural event. What changes is the degree to which the inner formation is experienced as something directly seen.

My Experiences of Awakening and the Third Eye

My own experiences make the distinction between third-eye functioning and complete awakening particularly important. I experienced this inner seeing during both of my awakening experiences that were accompanied by self-realisation, and I experienced it for a third time during the temple imagery described earlier. But the third experience was different because the awakening was incomplete, or perhaps more accurately, it was a simple awakening without full self-realisation.

This suggests that the third eye may be closely synonymous with awakening, but the two cannot be treated as completely identical. The third-eye function can occur without complete awakening or self-realisation. There can be inner seeing, extraordinary brightness and a feeling of having awakened internally without the complete transformation associated with self-realisation. However it looks true that the way to full awakening is through third eye. It is like saying that door to awakening of meditation image is lively meditation image itself. When through prolonged and constant meditation it crosses certain threshhold of liveliness it becomes full awakening.

In my experience, the awakenings accompanied by self-realisation occurred at the level of sahasrara. The simple awakening associated mainly with the temple imagery was experienced around ajna, or did not fully express itself in sahasrara. This distinction helps explain why ajna and sahasrara can both be associated with extraordinary inner brightness while still representing different levels or qualities of experience. So third eye opening seems synonym to savikalpa samadhi.

Ajna, Sahasrara and the Difference Between Seeing and Realisation

At ajna, there can still be something resembling an object of perception. There is a seer and something that appears to be seen. The inner experience can be remarkably vivid, but it retains the character of seeing. This is precisely why ajna is associated with the third eye.

At sahasrara, however, the experience can move beyond inner perception. There can be full awakening together with self-realisation and complete nonduality. The issue is no longer simply whether a mental formation is bright enough to resemble sensory perception. The deeper transformation is that the distinction between the observer and the observed can itself disappear.

Therefore, sahasrara should not simply be understood as an even brighter version of ajna. Ajna represents the emergence or intensification of inner seeing; sahasrara, in the experience of full awakening, represents going beyond the separation between seer and seen. There can still be extraordinary brightness, but brightness is no longer the essential point. Self-realisation and nonduality become the defining features.

This also explains why I experienced third-eye-like inner perception during experiences that differed in their degree of awakening. The inner seeing could appear without complete self-realisation. The third eye, therefore, seems to be closely related to awakening because awakening makes inner perception exceptionally direct, but full awakening with self-realisation is something further.

Awakening as an Inner Opening of the Eyes

The word “awakening” itself now becomes particularly suggestive. When a person wakes from sleep, the physical eyes open and the external world becomes visible. The act of waking therefore naturally becomes associated with seeing. In the inner experience, something similar may happen while the physical eyes remain closed.

The difference is that instead of waking into the external sensory world, consciousness seems to wake into an internal world. The mental formations that previously existed only as thoughts or images can become directly perceptible, intensely bright and stable. It is as though the inner eye has opened while the physical eyes have remained closed.

This may be why the language of the third eye and awakening fits the experience so naturally. The physical eye sees objects after waking into the external world; the third eye sees the mental world after an inward awakening. The comparison is not intended to establish that a literal hidden eye exists. It describes the similarity in the experiential quality of becoming awake and seeing.

Thus, the internal mechanism or process that provides this experience of “waking up” can be called the third eye. It is the transition from ordinary mental representation toward direct inner perception.

The Continuum From Thought to Third Eye to Self-Realisation

The whole observation can therefore be seen as a continuum. Ordinary thought already contains a rudimentary form of inner seeing because a mental formation can be experienced without a corresponding external object. Sensory perception is normally stronger because continuous sensory input keeps the mental representation uniformly alive. Pure thought reveals respiratory fluctuations more clearly because there is no sensory supplementation. During spontaneous breath suspension while its work taken up by kundalini, an internally generated formation can become uniformly bright and stable. When this inner brightness becomes strong enough to resemble direct sensory perception, the experience can be described as a fully open third eye.

At ajna, this inner seeing can become particularly prominent, which explains its traditional association with the third eye. It can occur without full mystical awakening and may exist in lesser degrees in ordinary people. In my own experience, however, it became especially clear during awakening experiences. The temple imagery represented a simpler or incomplete awakening mainly associated with ajna, while the experiences accompanied by self-realisation reached sahasrara.

At sahasrara, the process goes beyond seeing. Full awakening with self-realisation and nonduality is not merely the perfecting of mental brightness. It is a change in the relationship between consciousness, the observer and the perceived world.

The third eye, then, may be understood not as a mysterious physical organ but as a name for the awakening of inner perception. Its ordinary form may already exist in every thought and mental image. Its stronger form appears when inner formations become independent of continuous sensory support and acquire exceptional brightness and stability. Its fullest perceptual expression resembles direct sensory seeing with the physical eyes closed. And when awakening proceeds beyond perception into self-realisation and complete nonduality, the experience reaches a different dimension associated, in this framework, with sahasrara.

This makes the traditional expression “opening of the third eye” less mysterious. It can be understood as an awakening of the capacity to see inwardly, first in ordinary mental forms, then with increasing brightness and directness, and finally with an intensity that can resemble external perception itself. The remarkable point is that the physical eyes need not open for this inner seeing to begin. In fact, the paradox is precisely that one can feel as though one has awakened and begun to see while the physical eyes remain closed. However both eyes are not fully equal. Outside is outside, and inside is inside. Therefore, difference is jenuine, still many things are in common.